Posts belonging to Category 'natural treatment for asthma'

INHALED STEROIDS COULD CONTRIBUTE TO CATARACTS

Question:

Oh, isn’t this the very same Richard Friedel, who fell flat on his nose in de.alt.naturheilkunde… ? Aribert Deckers —                     POLICE – POLIZEI – POLITIE – POLICIA                   http://www.ariplex.com/ama/amapolis.htm

Response:

Inhaled Steroids Could Contribute to Cataracts

…. If your agenda is that Indian pranayam (yog) is better than western methods of treating asthma, I’d guess you are right. 1) General unsoundness of orthodox asthma treatment. As anybody can see from a Google search with the words  "cause of asthma"  known OR unknown the cause is unknown to western medicine. The frequently repeated statement that the cause is inflammation of the airways and that this should be treated with steroid spray etc. is only a working hypothesis. This means that western medicine is an experiment as regards asthma. Furthermore it is often proclaimed that asthma drugs enable asthmatics to do sport.  This is of course not wrong in principle, but the fact that up to 80% of athletes in some disciplines such as cross country skiing and the Tour de France means that the word asthma is being used with two different meanings, because one would expect only around 10% at the most of athletes to really have asthma.  Bottom line is that the word asthma is used in an argument enabling athletes to dope themselves with asthma drugs. All this should call for caution about the activities of doctors and asthma drug makers. It is not a question of getting the "best possible medical advice" but of a bit of common sense. 2)      Ethnomedicine.         In the East (pranayam, TCM) slightly obstructing an inhale is recognized as a beneficial exercise, think of nada sodhanna (alternate nostril breathing) and ujjayi (oceanic breathing).  This is admittedly not generally recommended as a cure for asthma, but probably if such an attitude to breathing is widespread, asthma would be unlikely to occur in the first place, because breathing would be healthy. As "representional tools" the chakras seem to scientific and almost common sense. 3)      Defective breathing exercises in the West. Generally (it seems) the all-important diaphragmatic breathing, which generally accepted as effective against asthma, is taught by lying down and putting one hand on the chest and the other on the abdomen and then breathing so as to minimize chest movement and maximize abdomen movement.  See  http://www.ohiou.edu/isarp/conf_02/papr_4.htm , page 10 on "belly puffing".  This practice would of course tend to prove in a circular argement to western doctors that breathing exercises are non-specific, and more like a massage. Authentic pranayam is not taught in this manner. 4)      Wrong beliefs about nose function in the West.         Although recent research shows the physiological effects of a sniff maneuver in stimulating the diaphragm and producing a deep breath, the standard belief among western physicians is that the resistance in the nose should only that due to "warming, humidifying and filtering the air". As a result operations on the nose may lead to there being an abnormally low resistance and a life of serious disease.  The popular error about nose resistance being minimal is abused to produce so many iatrogenic effects. 5)      Beneficial effects of "SIMT" (specific inspiratory muscle training) and certain incentive spirometers.         SIMT is shown to have beneficial effect on asthma (do a Google search with the words:  inspiratory  training). There are various manufacturers of devices in the field. Patent specifications speak of using incnetive spirometers offering an adjustable resistance on an inhale to inflate the lungs and prevent atelectasis. This would imply that the SIMT devices would have the same effect and might well teach an asthmatic to rely on natural nose or throat resistance to avoid being short of breath owing to air trapping (comparable to atelectasis) and to overcome bronchospasm by natural means. Research on SIMT does state that the resistance due to bronchospasm is to be overcome by strengthening inspiratory muscles. This possibility is never mentioned in the apparently so comprehensive material produced for patients from the various orthodox asthma organizations and the pharmaceuticals industry. It therefore seems quite clear that nose resistance plays a vital role for inflating the lungs, although of course we normally breathe at rest or during exertion with minimized resistance. 6)      Practical suggestions avoiding asthma drugs.         I would therefore strongly suggest to those plagued by any sort of unnatural shortness of breath due to a functional disorder and not due an infectious disease or cancer to try out an SIMT device; or more simply and perhaps more effectively to try the following: Simply  put a finger into your mouth between your teeth and lips to leave a gap and then breathing in the this gap so that your cheeks are pulled in a bit. There may then well be the feeling that the gap is somehow directly wired with the action of your diaphragm.  The smaller the gap, the more powerful the diaphragm action – a bit like the effect of a reliever spray in some cases. This "pursed lips inhale" may in some respects be better than using an SIMT device, since it is easy to vary the gap and therefore more sensitively control the diaphragm. Regards, Richard Friedel

Response:

Inhaled Steroids Could Contribute to Cataracts By Amanda Gardner HealthDay Reporter Thursday, September 18, 2003 Thursday, Sept. 18 (HealthDayNews) – Researchers say they have preliminary evidence that long-term use of inhaled steroids for asthma may contribute to the formation of cataracts. The news, reported in the Sept. 20 issue of the British Journal of Ophthalmology, is not entirely new. And some experts are divided over the risk posed by steroids. "Steroids administered systemically are well known to cause cataracts," says Dr. Richard Bensinger, a spokesman for the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Dr. Robert Cykiert, a clinical associate professor at New York University School of Medicine, says, "There have been reports going back two to three years associating inhaled steroids for patients who have asthma and cataracts. The thing is, it’s very rare. I’ve seen thousands of patients who have taken inhaled steroids for asthma and, of those I’ve had maybe two that have mild cataracts." Inhaled steroids are widely prescribed for asthma and other respiratory problems, including allergies. Cataracts are the number one cause of impaired vision and blindness in the world. The authors of the new study used data from the United Kingdom’s General Practice Research Database, which has complete prescribing and diagnostic information for almost 1.5 million patients in England and Wales. All told, 15,479 people with cataracts and 15,479 people without this condition were included in the study. The average age of the participants was 75 years old and about two-thirds were women. In the group with cataracts, 11.4 percent had been prescribed inhaled steroids, versus 7.6 percent of those without cataracts. The risk seemed to increase with higher dosages and long- term use. People who took up to 400 micrograms per day apparently had no increased risk, but those taking doses higher than 1,600 micrograms per day had a 70 percent increased risk. For many people who need inhaled steroids, this may come down to a choice between two illnesses. "Doctors describe steroids as a wonderful awful drug," Bensinger says. "The effects are wonderful. They’re absolutely critical to the practice of medicine, but they have a lot of undesirable effects." Cataracts are one of those effects, but it’s also one of the most treatable conditions around. "Treatments are extraordinarily successful," Bensinger says. "It’s not a big deal to go through. It’s almost always local anesthetic, so it’s not to be feared." Without steroids, some people with asthma may not live long enough to develop cataracts, he adds. There are also ways to limit absorption of steroids in the body, something which is not mentioned in the study. "We have patients wash out their mouth or brush their teeth after using steroids to limit systemic absorption," says Dr. Robert Giusti, director of the Cystic Fibrosis Center at Long Island College Hospital in New York City. There are also second-generation inhaled steroids that are cleared by the liver. The study seems to have looked at earlier drugs that do not have this advantage, Giusti adds. If nothing else, the study seems to be an argument for taking the lowest dose possible for the shortest time possible. "I have no doubt in my mind [that inhaled steroids lead to cataracts] from a clinical practice," says Dr. Rajiv Luthra, an ophthalmologist and epidemiologist at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation in New Orleans. "If it’s taken on a constant basis, which is every day or every other day for months to years, it will cause a problem." More information The National Eye Institute has more information on cataracts. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/hsn/hl_hsn/storytext/SIG=03vbcq/*htt… The Asthma Society of Canada has more on inhaled steroids and asthma. http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/hsn/hl_hsn/storytext/SIG=cjji3g/*htt… Read the complete news at: http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=97&ncid=1422&e=10&u=/… Jai Maharaj http://www.mantra.com/jai Om Shanti Panchaang for 2 Ashvin 5104, Saturday, September 27, 2003: Shubhanu Nama Samvatsare Dakshinaya Jivana Ritau      Kanya Mase Shukl Pakshe Manta Vasara Yuktayam Chitra-Svati Nakshatr Indr-Vaidhruti Yog      Kaulav-Taitil Karan Dvitiya-Tritiya Yam Tithau Hindu Holocaust Museum http://www.mantra.com/holocaust Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy http://www.hindu.org http://www.hindunet.org The truth about Islam and Muslims http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate      o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.      o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.      o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are not necessarily those of the poster.

Response:

1. I should live so long! 2. I’m not female, 3. It’s a 20 minute operation. Pete – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Inhaled Steroids Could Contribute to Cataracts By Amanda Gardner HealthDay Reporter Thursday, September 18, 2003 Thursday, Sept. 18 (HealthDayNews) – Researchers say they have preliminary evidence that long-term use of inhaled steroids for asthma may contribute to the formation of cataracts. The news, reported in the Sept. 20 issue of the British Journal of Ophthalmology, is not entirely new. And some experts are divided over the risk posed by steroids. "Steroids administered systemically are well known to cause cataracts," says Dr. Richard Bensinger, a spokesman for the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Dr. Robert Cykiert, a clinical associate professor at New York University School of Medicine, says, "There have been reports going back two to three years associating inhaled steroids for patients who have asthma and cataracts. The thing is, it’s very rare. I’ve seen thousands of patients who have taken inhaled steroids for asthma and, of those I’ve had maybe two that have mild cataracts." Inhaled steroids are widely prescribed for asthma and other respiratory problems, including allergies. Cataracts are the number one cause of impaired vision and blindness in the world. The authors of the new study used data from the United Kingdom’s General Practice Research Database, which has complete prescribing and diagnostic information for almost 1.5 million patients in England and Wales. All told, 15,479 people with cataracts and 15,479 people without this condition were included in the study. The average age of the participants was 75 years old and about two-thirds were women. In the group with cataracts, 11.4 percent had been prescribed inhaled steroids, versus 7.6 percent of those without cataracts. The risk seemed to increase with higher dosages and long- term use. People who took up to 400 micrograms per day apparently had no increased risk, but those taking doses higher than 1,600 micrograms per day had a 70 percent increased risk. For many people who need inhaled steroids, this may come down to a choice between two illnesses. "Doctors describe steroids as a wonderful awful drug," Bensinger says. "The effects are wonderful. They’re absolutely critical to the practice of medicine, but they have a lot of undesirable effects." Cataracts are one of those effects, but it’s also one of the most treatable conditions around. "Treatments are extraordinarily successful," Bensinger says. "It’s not a big deal to go through. It’s almost always local anesthetic, so it’s not to be feared." Without steroids, some people with asthma may not live long enough to develop cataracts, he adds. There are also ways to limit absorption of steroids in the body, something which is not mentioned in the study. "We have patients wash out their mouth or brush their teeth after using steroids to limit systemic absorption," says Dr. Robert Giusti, director of the Cystic Fibrosis Center at Long Island College Hospital in New York City. There are also second-generation inhaled steroids that are cleared by the liver. The study seems to have looked at earlier drugs that do not have this advantage, Giusti adds. If nothing else, the study seems to be an argument for taking the lowest dose possible for the shortest time possible. "I have no doubt in my mind [that inhaled steroids lead to cataracts] from a clinical practice," says Dr. Rajiv Luthra, an ophthalmologist and epidemiologist at the Ochsner Clinic Foundation in New Orleans. "If it’s taken on a constant basis, which is every day or every other day for months to years, it will cause a problem." More information The National Eye Institute has more information on cataracts.

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/hsn/hl_hsn/storytext/SIG=03vbcq/*htt… The Asthma Society of Canada has more on inhaled steroids and asthma.

http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/hsn/hl_hsn/storytext/SIG=cjji3g/*htt… Read the complete news at:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=97&ncid=1422&e=10&u=/… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Jai Maharaj http://www.mantra.com/jai Om Shanti Panchaang for 2 Ashvin 5104, Saturday, September 27, 2003: Shubhanu Nama Samvatsare Dakshinaya Jivana Ritau      Kanya Mase Shukl Pakshe Manta Vasara Yuktayam Chitra-Svati Nakshatr Indr-Vaidhruti Yog      Kaulav-Taitil Karan Dvitiya-Tritiya Yam Tithau Hindu Holocaust Museum http://www.mantra.com/holocaust Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy http://www.hindu.org http://www.hindunet.org The truth about Islam and Muslims http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate      o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.      o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read, considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.      o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are not necessarily those of the poster.

Response:

A Simple, Natural Cure

Question:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Very sinister since the appropriate place for information of this sort is the peer reviewed scientific literature.  Of course the problem here is that you have to convince people who actually understand the subject – much harder than making wild claims to nonscientific types. The peer reviewed scientific literature is largely biased towards drug treatments. They might be somewhat reluctant to look at more simple, free, natural alternatives in case they "upset" some organisations, who they rely on for advertising revenue. Anyway, since there’s no money to be made selling water and salt who is going to put up all the money to do this research when there is no payback at the end.

Have you spent time in a hospital lately and seen the price of IV saline solution?  Therre is no money in salt and water Hey!!!! Kelly – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Before you buy.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – when there is no payback at the end. Ahh, but there is a payback for you Tommy boy!  It comes in the form of a series of forwarded emails, all which appear to have been constructed by you. G’day Scooby SYDNEY HOP TONIGHT

Dear nanotech, What a sad life you must lead. So, you know my name and where I’m from and have archives of all my previous posts. Big deal! Do you think I care? Frankly, I don’t know why you bother your arse doing it. Couldn’t you be doing something more productive like cleaning your fingernails? Also, you don’t know the meaning of the following words: spam, troll. Before you buy.

Response:

It has been shown in studies that in some individuals dehydration can cause bronchospasm and loss of lung function. References?

Your memory must be slipping. I’ve posted a link to a study a couple of times in the past. Put the words "asthma", "dehydration" and "buffalo" into a search engine. How about some facts rather than speculation?  Please define what standard you are using to define ‘enough’ water.

The average person needs at least 2 litres/liters/quarts per day to stay properly hydrated. This is a generally accepted figure by the medical community. I seem to vaguely recall you once saying that the onset of your asthma was around the time you were suffering "dehydration injuries". Correct me if I’m wrong. Yup, and after I was diagnosed with asthma and placed on a treatment program I became less susceptible to dehydration injury.  You see, active asthma symptoms cause people to lose water through respiration at a faster rate.  Once you control the asthma, you also control the dehydration.  (BTW, my reference here is the Mereck Manual.) The thing to note here is that the asthma _causes_ the dehydration – not the other way around.

As far as I can tell,  you believe that your emerging asthma caused your dehydration problems and when the asthma was treated with drugs the dehydration problems stopped. Did you ever consider that the reverse might be true i.e. the severe dehydration might have triggered the emergence of the asthma in the first place? Anyway, how can dehydration be treated with drugs? The way to treat dehydration is by consuming more water (and salt). Before you buy.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Very sinister since the appropriate place for information of this sort is the peer reviewed scientific literature.  Of course the problem here is that you have to convince people who actually understand the subject – much harder than making wild claims to nonscientific types. The peer reviewed scientific literature is largely biased towards drug treatments. They might be somewhat reluctant to look at more simple, free, natural alternatives in case they "upset" some organisations, who they rely on for advertising revenue. Anyway, since there’s no money to be made selling water and salt who is going to put up all the money to do this research when there is no payback at the end. Have you been in a hospital and seen the price of an IV bag of saline solution?  No money in water and Salt  hey!!! Before you buy. Very sinister since the appropriate place for information of this sort is the peer reviewed scientific literature.  Of course the problem here is that you have to convince people who actually understand the subject – much harder than making wild claims to nonscientific types. The peer reviewed scientific literature is largely biased towards drug treatments. They might be somewhat reluctant to look at more simple, free, natural alternatives in case they "upset" some organisations, who they rely on for advertising revenue. Anyway, since there’s no money to be made selling water and salt who is going to put up all the money to do this research when there is no payback at the end. Before you buy. Very sinister since the appropriate place for information of this sort is the peer reviewed scientific literature.  Of course the problem here is that you have to convince people who actually understand the subject – much harder than making wild claims to nonscientific types. The peer reviewed scientific literature is largely biased towards drug treatments. They might be somewhat reluctant to look at more simple, free, natural alternatives in case they "upset" some organisations, who they rely on for advertising revenue. Anyway, since there’s no money to be made selling water and salt who is going to put up all the money to do this research when there is no payback at the end. Before you buy.

Response:

Physiological fact: In some people dehydration can cause bronchospasm and increased mucus production. Fact: Many people are almost permanently in a state of mild to moderate dehydration. Conclusions: Blatantly obvious. This is the best you can do?  First of all, you say ‘can cause’ – have you actually tested this to find out if this is actually true?

It has been shown in studies that in some individuals dehydration can cause bronchospasm and loss of lung function. Anyway, lots of asthmatics themselves know that if they become severely dehydrated they can end up wheezing. Drinking lots of water stops the bronchospasm and the mucus begins to loosen. And what makes you think that ‘many people’ are in a permanent state of dehydration?

I don’t think it’s debatable that many people do not drink enough water every day. They drink caffeinated drinks, which causes further dehydration or other beverages which are no substitute for water. Consequently, lots of people are in an almost permanent state of at least mild dehydration. BTW, I know about dehydration injuries from personal experience.  Odd that I have never seen difficulty breathing as a symptom of a dehydration injury (and this is in cases where medical assistance was required).

I seem to vaguely recall you once saying that the onset of your asthma was around the time you were suffering "dehydration injuries". Correct me if I’m wrong. Before you buy.

Response:

It has been shown in studies that in some individuals dehydration can cause bronchospasm and loss of lung function. References? Your memory must be slipping. I’ve posted a link to a study a couple of times in the past. Put the words "asthma", "dehydration" and "buffalo" into a search engine.

I did.  The reference I found indicated that the AAAAI is not too impressed.   "Although the strong recommendations in this article for prophylactic heavy oral fluid intake appear to be logical, there is not a lot of convincing evidence from good studies that such fluid intake actually hydrates the bronchial mucus to considerable degree, as contrasted to the sizable bronchial tree hydration achieved by increasing reasonably the humidity of the inspired air. But for at least other reasons, ingestion of fluids with appropriate electrolyte content before and during (prolonged) exercise in hot weather is a reasonable approach." Source: http://www.aaaai.org/aadmc/inthenews/wypr/1999archive/dehydration.html How about some facts rather than speculation?  Please define what standard you are using to define ‘enough’ water. The average person needs at least 2 litres/liters/quarts per day to stay properly hydrated. This is a generally accepted figure by the medical community.

So you are saying that drinking this much water will prevent or control asthma?   The thing to note here is that the asthma _causes_ the dehydration – not the other way around. As far as I can tell,  you believe that your emerging asthma caused your dehydration problems and when the asthma was treated with drugs the dehydration problems stopped.

Actually this is from the Mereck manual.  It is not a belief (since beliefs are things that are not subject to objective analysis) but a statement of known scientific/medical fact. BTW, before my body adapts to an extreme climate I am very susceptible to dehydration injuries.  I can tell you from experience that being dehydrated to the point where I require medical attention does not aggravate my asthma. Did you ever consider that the reverse might be true i.e. the severe dehydration might have triggered the emergence of the asthma in the first place?

No – and I never considered that the world is flat either. Anyway, how can dehydration be treated with drugs? The way to treat dehydration is by consuming more water (and salt).

Since when did I say that dehydration can be treated with drugs? (Although IV Saline/glucose is one of the standard treatments.) What I said is that since active asthma causes you to dehydrate, treating the asthma will reduce the risk of a dehydration injury. Note – a word of warning.  Last August I made myself very ill by drinking too much water in a hot/dry environment on an empty stomach. Apparently, if you do this you upset the ph balance in your stomach and it stops absorbing water and nutrients. "Being responsible sometimes means pissing people off."    General Colin Powell

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – when there is no payback at the end. Ahh, but there is a payback for you Tommy boy!  It comes in the form of a series of forwarded emails, all which appear to have been constructed by you. Here in this country you have freedom to speak what you want, however with such freedom comes responsibility.  Therefore, I have taken your mail and forwarded your unproven statements and quackery to your State Attorney General’s consumer affairs dept, the FDA and the FTC.  Perhaps soon you’ll be given an opportunity to prove your statements to them…..I only wish that I could be there to watch as you defend your pathetically stupid commentary.  Bottom line is that unless you can defend yourself with some intelligence you may well be looking at criminal charges of fraud……and since you ship the material I am sure the Postal Inspectors would love to be involved.  That would allow you to graduate from State statutes to Federal review. Have a GREAT day!

Hey Scooby! Thanks for that post. It was one of the funniest I have ever read. I may need to go to a doctor to get the grin on my face surgically removed. You really need to come down from out of the clouds and cut back on whatever substances you are taking. I wonder what you were in your previous lives. Maybe part of the Spanish Inquisition. Scooby sends yet another witch to be burned at the stake. Maybe a member of the Gestapo in Nazi Germany. Watch out!, there goes Scooby in his brown shirt, goosestepping down the street. Don’t say anything against the official party line or Herr Scooby will have you "silenced". It’s wrong to have views that don’t conform. It is not good for ze fatherland. shagging clue what you’re talking about. You don’t know your arse from your elbow. Have a SUPER day! Before you buy.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Physiological fact: In some people dehydration can cause bronchospasm and increased mucus production. Fact: Many people are almost permanently in a state of mild to moderate dehydration. Conclusions: Blatantly obvious. This is the best you can do?  First of all, you say ‘can cause’ – have you actually tested this to find out if this is actually true? It has been shown in studies that in some individuals dehydration can cause bronchospasm and loss of lung function.

References? Anyway, lots of asthmatics themselves know that if they become severely dehydrated they can end up wheezing. Drinking lots of water stops the bronchospasm and the mucus begins to loosen.

Really?  I notice that so far you have made no claims that are subject to verification. And what makes you think that ‘many people’ are in a permanent state of dehydration? I don’t think it’s debatable that many people do not drink enough water every day. They drink caffeinated drinks, which causes further dehydration or other beverages which are no substitute for water. Consequently, lots of people are in an almost permanent state of at least mild dehydration.

How about some facts rather than speculation?  Please define what standard you are using to define ‘enough’ water. BTW, I know about dehydration injuries from personal experience.  Odd that I have never seen difficulty breathing as a symptom of a dehydration injury (and this is in cases where medical assistance was required). I seem to vaguely recall you once saying that the onset of your asthma was around the time you were suffering "dehydration injuries". Correct me if I’m wrong.

Yup, and after I was diagnosed with asthma and placed on a treatment program I became less susceptible to dehydration injury.  You see, active asthma symptoms cause people to lose water through respiration at a faster rate.  Once you control the asthma, you also control the dehydration.  (BTW, my reference here is the Mereck Manual.) The thing to note here is that the asthma _causes_ the dehydration – not the other way around. "Being responsible sometimes means pissing people off."    General Colin Powell

Response:

Really?  Then impress me with the results of peer reviewed scientific research that tests and proves the theory. Physiological fact: In some people dehydration can cause bronchospasm and increased mucus production. Fact: Many people are almost permanently in a state of mild to moderate dehydration. Conclusions: Blatantly obvious.

This is the best you can do?  First of all, you say ‘can cause’ – have you actually tested this to find out if this is actually true? And what makes you think that ‘many people’ are in a permanent state of dehydration? BTW, I know about dehydration injuries from personal experience.  Odd that I have never seen difficulty breathing as a symptom of a dehydration injury (and this is in cases where medical assistance was required). "Being responsible sometimes means pissing people off."    General Colin Powell

Response:

Very sinister since the appropriate place for information of this sort is the peer reviewed scientific literature.  Of course the problem here is that you have to convince people who actually understand the subject – much harder than making wild claims to nonscientific types.

The peer reviewed scientific literature is largely biased towards drug treatments. They might be somewhat reluctant to look at more simple, free, natural alternatives in case they "upset" some organisations, who they rely on for advertising revenue. Anyway, since there’s no money to be made selling water and salt who is going to put up all the money to do this research when there is no payback at the end. Before you buy.

Response:

Physiological fact: In some people dehydration can cause bronchospasm and increased mucus production. Fact: Many people are almost permanently in a state of mild to moderate dehydration. Conclusions: Blatantly obvious.

Your facts are straight; your conclusions aren’t. I have had pneumonia due to dehydration, and yes, it made my asthma worse. However, making sure that I had adequate water did not cure my asthma. It simply prevented me from getting pneumonia due to dehydration again. Asthma in many cases is an allergic disease, and asthma attacks are caused by other factors than dehydration. Getting an adequate amount of water doesn’t prevent allergic reactions. In fact, if one has asthma, getting an adequate amount of water won’t cure asthma (that is, one will never have an asthmatic episode, ever, for the rest of one’s life). Asthmatics need to have adequate water for various reasons, but water will not cure asthma. Joan

Response:

For many people their asthma is a result of chronic dehydration and salt shortage. For these people their asthma can be greatly alleviated or even cured simply by increasing daily water and salt intake. You again?  I take it that you are immune to facts. I think it is you who refuses to accept basic physiological facts and who keeps his head buried in the sand.

Really?  Then impress me with the results of peer reviewed scientific research that tests and proves the theory. "Being responsible sometimes means pissing people off."    General Colin Powell

Response:

If only the medical community had discovered water on this planet, we could have cured asthma generations ago.  Another cure for asthma for the price of a book–who knew it would be so easy? Oh, they’ve discoverd water alright, but they didn’t really bother to look into the effects of long term dehydration on the human body. Imagine, actually having to hand over real, proper money/legal tender that you’ve earned in a job in order to obtain more detailed explanations of this information in what is called a "book"! It sounds very sinister, doesn’t it?

Very sinister since the appropriate place for information of this sort is the peer reviewed scientific literature.  Of course the problem here is that you have to convince people who actually understand the subject – much harder than making wild claims to nonscientific types. "Being responsible sometimes means pissing people off."    General Colin Powell

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – For many people their asthma is a result of chronic dehydration and salt shortage. For these people their asthma can be greatly alleviated or even cured simply by increasing daily water and salt intake. You again?  I take it that you are immune to facts. I think it is you who refuses to accept basic physiological facts and who keeps his head buried in the sand. Really?  Then impress me with the results of peer reviewed scientific research that tests and proves the theory.

Physiological fact: In some people dehydration can cause bronchospasm and increased mucus production. Fact: Many people are almost permanently in a state of mild to moderate dehydration. Conclusions: Blatantly obvious. Before you buy.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Very sinister since the appropriate place for information of this sort is the peer reviewed scientific literature.  Of course the problem here is that you have to convince people who actually understand the subject – much harder than making wild claims to nonscientific types. The peer reviewed scientific literature is largely biased towards drug treatments. They might be somewhat reluctant to look at more simple, free, natural alternatives in case they "upset" some organisations, who they rely on for advertising revenue. Anyway, since there’s no money to be made selling water and salt who is going to put up all the money to do this research when there is no payback at the end.

well for a start there are the UK teaching hospitals…they can use all the cuts in drug bills they can manage…or how about Cuba or pretty much any developing nation there are plenty of people with an incentive to research this…but they’ll all look at the fact that dehydration does not normally cause asthma and laugh at you — eric "live fast, die only if strictly necessary"

Response:

when there is no payback at the end.

Ahh, but there is a payback for you Tommy boy!  It comes in the form of a series of forwarded emails, all which appear to have been constructed by you. Here in this country you have freedom to speak what you want, however with such freedom comes responsibility.  Therefore, I have taken your mail and forwarded your unproven statements and quackery to your State Attorney General’s consumer affairs dept, the FDA and the FTC.  Perhaps soon you’ll be given an opportunity to prove your statements to them…..I only wish that I could be there to watch as you defend your pathetically stupid commentary.  Bottom line is that unless you can defend yourself with some intelligence you may well be looking at criminal charges of fraud……and since you ship the material I am sure the Postal Inspectors would love to be involved.  That would allow you to graduate from State statutes to Federal review. Have a GREAT day! Scooby RCP, EMT-P Perinatal-Pediatric Respiratory Specialist This mail is a natural product.  The slight variations in spelling and grammar enhance its individual character and beauty and in no way are to be considered flaws or defects.

Response:

Very sinister since the appropriate place for information of this sort is the peer reviewed scientific literature.  Of course the problem here is that you have to convince people who actually understand the subject – much harder than making wild claims to nonscientific types. The peer reviewed scientific literature is largely biased towards drug treatments. They might be somewhat reluctant to look at more simple, free, natural alternatives in case they "upset" some organisations, who they rely on for advertising revenue.

Ah, the old ‘conspiracy’ claim.  Odd how every quack seems to say this also.  I bet you cannot supply any evidence to support your accusations. Anyway, since there’s no money to be made selling water and salt who is going to put up all the money to do this research when there is no payback at the end.

Lets see:  How about the American Lung Association?  How about any public university?  How about the US National Institutes Of Health? How about _any_ health insurance provider?  (Who really have an incentive to reduce the costs of asthma treatment and care.) "Being responsible sometimes means pissing people off."    General Colin Powell

Response:

For many people their asthma is a result of chronic dehydration and salt shortage. For these people their asthma can be greatly alleviated or even cured simply by increasing daily water and salt intake. http://www.watercure.com/Topics3.htm Before you buy.

Response:

If only the medical community had discovered water on this planet, we could have cured asthma generations ago.  Another cure for asthma for the price of a book–who knew it would be so easy?? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – For many people their asthma is a result of chronic dehydration and salt shortage. For these people their asthma can be greatly alleviated or even cured simply by increasing daily water and salt intake. http://www.watercure.com/Topics3.htm Before you buy.

Response:

For many people their asthma is a result of chronic dehydration and salt shortage. For these people their asthma can be greatly alleviated or even cured simply by increasing daily water and salt intake.

You again?  I take it that you are immune to facts. "Being responsible sometimes means pissing people off."    General Colin Powell

Response:

For many people their asthma is a result of chronic dehydration and salt shortage.

For many people their asthma is a result of overexposure to money and poverty shortage when I’ve written it you will be able to buy my book from my website and I can guarantee that you will be less exposed to money than before coming soon…I cure leukaemia with my revolutionary new herbal hair extensions — eric "I got in touch with my inner child, he told me to grow up"

Response:

For many people their asthma is a result of chronic dehydration and salt shortage. For these people their asthma can be greatly alleviated or even cured simply by increasing daily water and salt intake. You again?  I take it that you are immune to facts.

I think it is you who refuses to accept basic physiological facts and who keeps his head buried in the sand. Before you buy.

Response:

If only the medical community had discovered water on this planet, we could have cured asthma generations ago.  Another cure for asthma for the price of a book–who knew it would be so easy?

Oh, they’ve discoverd water alright, but they didn’t really bother to look into the effects of long term dehydration on the human body. Imagine, actually having to hand over real, proper money/legal tender that you’ve earned in a job in order to obtain more detailed explanations of this information in what is called a "book"! It sounds very sinister, doesn’t it? Before you buy.

Response:

*Second hand* Smoking w/ Cats & Dogs

Question:

I had a vet about six years ago tell me that secondhand smoke damages the lungs of pets.  I don’t know of any studies, but I am sure if you did an internet search you could find one.   Tracy – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

I would simply assume that being an oxygen-breathing mammal with lungs, that they would be just as prone to damage by second hand smoke as any other animal, of which humans are, too.  Dogs are a little different in the way Cancers sometimes act in them, from what I understand, but I can’t imagine that constantly being around smoke would do no harm. GH

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

I smoked for 14 years, actually. I quit just about 2 months ago. I didn’t smoke in the same room with my animals and I think it’s ridiculous to say that a smoker shouldn’t say anything about the safety or well being of animals. Mine are very healthy and well cared for, which is far more than I can say for greater than 70% of the patients I see every shift. And most of their delightful owners are non-smoking jerks. Although I am very pleased not to be smoking any longer, I do not feel that a persons choice to smoke or not smoke has anything to do with the content of their character or their ability to be a good, loving, and responsible pet owner. And a little more on topic, last months BirdTalk ran an article about the effects of second hand smoke on birds. And I believe that there have been some studies published in the JAVMA also. For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical.

Practice random acts of intelligence and senseless acts of self control. * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet’s Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet – Free!

Response:

I know the cancer rate in my cats went down after I quit 6 years ago. Twyla Jane – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

I can’t say for certain, but I would suspect that second hand smoke might be almost as bad for our pets as for children.  Children have small airways so more of the smoke is going to be able be caught in the mucus (and they breathe more often) than adults and childrens cells are more sensitive to carcinogens than adult cells because they are dividing more frequently. Dividing and growing means that there can be more damage relative to cells that are dividing only infrequently to produce replacements. They pets are not growing as quickly perhaps, but they do have smaller airways and they do breathe faster.  This I suspect should lead to more problems from second hand smoke for pets than an adult human but less than a human child.  Of course, kittens and pups will have as much perhaps more problems than a human infant.  They are smaller to start and grow much faster. Larry Osborne

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

Ask yourself, does it affect humans? Cats and Dogs lungs work in just the same way as ours.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

Response:

Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying.

x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

Oh come on! Facts please, so the idiot lurkers dont start another war 97% of all animates die of cancer. FACT. Stop putting your butts up their butts did you? Thats about the only difference you quitting doing that would have. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I know the cancer rate in my cats went down after I quit 6 years ago. Twyla Jane

Response:

Yes Tracy, nobody knows of any studies, but they are always prepared to come up with these FACTS – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I had a vet about six years ago tell me that secondhand smoke damages the lungs of pets.  I don’t know of any studies, but I am sure if you did an internet search you could find one. Tracy x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Yep, here we go again, can’t say for certain. = bs! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I can’t say for certain, but I would suspect that second hand smoke might be almost as bad for our pets as for children.  Children have small airways so more of the smoke is going to be able be caught in the mucus (and they breathe more often) than adults and childrens cells are more sensitive to carcinogens than adult cells because they are dividing more frequently. Dividing and growing means that there can be more damage relative to cells that are dividing only infrequently to produce replacements. They pets are not growing as quickly perhaps, but they do have smaller airways and they do breathe faster.  This I suspect should lead to more problems from second hand smoke for pets than an adult human but less than a human child.  Of course, kittens and pups will have as much perhaps more problems than a human infant.  They are smaller to start and grow much faster. Larry Osborne x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Oh my GOD! Watering lawns causes cancer in dogs who smoke indoors! Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

I reserve the right to kill myself the way I choose. I also acknowledge the safety of others, including my babies There does not have to be a confict in that. I have my room. Those that choose to visit me in my room know that there will be traces of cigarette smoke. I choose not to smoke a cigarette when I have visitors, but I cannot control the idiot cat! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying. x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her?

I can’t imagine doggy lungs being any different to human lungs, which is why dogs often end up as lab animals :-( You could try giving the facts regarding second hand smoke, but IMHO, most smokers don’t tend to be too concerned about other people’s (or animals) health, even if the passive smokers are their very own family. Godd luck though, your message might get through. I hope it does. Yowie

Response:

Yep, here we go again, can’t say for certain. = bs!

Dave, are you an angry smoker?  There are lung cancer studies done on beagles. You can search them out, I don’t have time to do it for you. I have read them in the past, and they do prove that breathing cigarette smoke is just as dangerous for dogs as for humans.  The reason more dogs don’t show us the lung damage is simply related to the lifespan of dogs.  They usually die of something else before the lung damage does them in. Kyla, DVM

Response:

Second hand smoke affects animals as it does people. What we see most often is allergic reactions to the smoke. The RAST allergy test we use includes tobacco smoke and many animals appear to be sensitive. Some, presumably smokers, may make light of second hand smoke but it does cause clinical problems in some pets. We have many owners that although they have not given up smoking no longer smoke indoors.We applaud their concern. JEP – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Oh my GOD! Watering lawns causes cancer in dogs who smoke indoors! Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

– JEP  vet http://www.wbvc.bc.ca Before you buy.

Response:

It may be that animals only suffer the more minor reactions to smoke, as you mention, rather than actually developing cancer, since they are smart enough to leave the area which the human is smoking. While we humans stay nearby, inhaling more. Just another example of our pets being smarter than ourselves!  ;-) — "For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Second hand smoke affects animals as it does people. What we see most often is allergic reactions to the smoke. The RAST allergy test we use includes tobacco smoke and many animals appear to be sensitive. Some, presumably smokers, may make light of second hand smoke but it does cause clinical problems in some pets. We have many owners that although they have not given up smoking no longer smoke indoors.We applaud their concern. JEP Oh my GOD! Watering lawns causes cancer in dogs who smoke indoors! Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC. — JEP  vet http://www.wbvc.bc.ca Before you buy.

Response:

Eosinophils only kill parasites.  They’re not related to passive smoking, or a result of passive smoking. They can most commonly be a result of an allergy, such as hayfever. [plus, they can cause asthma.] Stop pretending to be a scientist. Vanessa

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just saw a case 2 weeks back. 9m chihuahua with owners who were heavy smokers. Dog was presented for coughing and inappetance. Bld tests showed increased eosinophils. Conclude for yourself.

Response:

Eosinophils only kill parasites.  They’re not related to passive smoking, or a result of passive smoking. They can most commonly be a result of an allergy, such as hayfever. [plus, they can cause asthma.] Stop pretending to be a scientist. Vanessa

Ok Sherlock, first you say they *only* kill parasites, then you say they result from allergies.   But how can they result from allergies to then function as parasite killers?  Makes no sense to me, BTW I am a scientist. Eosinophils counts are higher in parasite infested animals, and in allergic reactions.  They cannot cause asthma. You need to read up before slamming a medical opinion.  Take a course in logic and another in  technical writing. Kyla, DVM

Response:

Okay and where did this "fact" come from?  It is NOT true.  Renal failure makes up a big percentage of animal deaths.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Oh come on! Facts please, so the idiot lurkers dont start another war 97% of all animates die of cancer. FACT. Stop putting your butts up their butts did you? Thats about the only difference you quitting doing that would have. I know the cancer rate in my cats went down after I quit 6 years ago. Twyla Jane

Response:

Oh okay and the cat understands this right?  You really are a moron.  Time for the killfile.  I suggest everyone else do the same.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I reserve the right to kill myself the way I choose. I also acknowledge the safety of others, including my babies There does not have to be a confict in that. I have my room. Those that choose to visit me in my room know that there will be traces of cigarette smoke. I choose not to smoke a cigarette when I have visitors, but I cannot control the idiot cat! Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying. x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Oh come on! Facts please, so the idiot lurkers dont start another war 97% of all animates die of cancer. FACT.

Would you like to quote your source for this factoid (which is patently false)? Kyla, DVM

Response:

eosinophil: A white cell of the category known as granulocytes. These cells contain numerous dense granules in their cytoplasm that comprise a battery of highly active digestive chemicals and toxins. Their chief role is thought to be in combatting large parasites, although occasionally their activity may be triggered by other agents, potentially leading to damage of normal tissues (see eosinophilia myalgia syndrome). Source:  http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/cfs/glossary.htm New Light Shed On The Enigmatic Eosinophil Granulocyte; A Versatile Cell Of The Immune System. Arne Egesten and Johan Malm* – Abstract Eosinophils normally constitute only a few per cent of circulating leukocytes, though they are more numerous in tissues vulnerable to attack by environmental microorganisms. Eosinophils can kill invasive parasites, but they also have immunoregulatory functions and may be involved in, for example, the connective tissue remodeling that occurs in conjunction with inflammation. Although their effects may be beneficial to the host, for instance in the event of helminthic infestation, they may also cause tissue damage, for example in allergy and asthma. Recent years have witnessed significant advances in our knowledge of these fascinating but still enigmatic cells. Source: http://www.broombio.demon.co.uk/jifcc/Articles/eosinophil/new_light_s… the_enigmatic_.htm iet controls cat’s food allergies – DR. ROBERT SCOTT D.V.M. – - Special To The News Herald Dear Dr. Scott, A few months ago my cat Callie began vomiting after every meal. My veterinarian said Callie had a high eosinophil count and switched her to a special diet of chicken, dried duck, and potatoes. Since I have started her on the new diet, the vomiting has stopped. Can you tell me what eosinophils are, and why they caused her to vomit after eating? Melissa Dear Melissa, An eosinophil is a type of white blood cell that usually comprises from 2 to 12 percent of a cat’s total white blood cells. However, this percentage may rise dramatically if the cat is infected with parasites or if the animal is having an allergic response to something. This is due to the fact that eosinophils mobilize to help kill parasites as well as to help rid the body of the irritating substance causing the allergic reaction. Because Callie had a high eosinophil count, your veterinarian no doubt suspected an allergy or a parasite. You did not mention if Callie was tested for parasites or not, but because she has improved on her new diet, her problem was most likely a food allergy. Food allergies are relatively rare in cats, but when they do occur, they can cause many unpleasant problems such as vomiting, diarrhea, itching, and skin lesions. Source:  http://www.newsherald.com/archive/lifestyle/vs121497.htm Table 1. Likely and less likely causes of eosinophilia on the basis of severity (absolute eosinophil count) Likely causes                             Less likely causes —-  Mild (0.7-1.5 X 109/L) Allergic rhinitis                        Neoplasm Hay fever or atopy                    Gastrointestinal disease Extrinsic asthma                        Skin disease Drug reaction                            Certain infectious diseases Parasitic disease                        Long-term dialysis Occupational lung disease        Radiation therapy                                                  Immunodeficiency state Source: http://www.postgradmed.com/issues/1999/03_99/brigden.htm The immune response to infection IL5 also secreted by Th2 cells recruits eosinophils which can kill parasites by exocytosing a cytotoxic protein, cationic basic protein. Source:  http://rheumb.bham.ac.uk/teaching/clinimmunol/ci_chap1.htm ALLERGY & ASTHMA JOURNAL WATCH – JANUARY 2000 The color of sputum samples from asthmatics was found to correlate with quantity of inflammatory cells and bacteria. The more the sputum appeared yellow or green, the greater were the number of neutrophils (cells associated with infection) and amount of cultured bacteria (also suggesting infection). The quantity of eosinophils (cells associated with allergies) did not vary with sputum color. There was no difference between asthmatic smokers and nonsmokers. JACI 1/00, p.182 Source:  http://www.allergyjournals.com/jan00.html Eosinophils – mischief-makers in asthma  Whatever are eosinophils? Eosinophils are a type of white blood cell (corpuscle) and take up the red dye eosin when blood is examined under a microscope by the commonest method. They accumulate wherever allergic reactions like those in asthma take place. Their natural role is to defend us against parasites. In fact allergies such as asthma are probably a malfunction of our protective mechanism against parasites.  Diagram of eosinophil as seen under the microscope after staining a blood smear with the red dye eosin, which stains the granules in the cytoplasm and with haematoxylin, which stains the nucleus blue. In the body all these things are colourless, of course. The nucleus consists of two lobes. The red-stained granules contain toxic proteins, ready for secretion from the cell. The toxins from the granules are important for killing parasites, but in asthma they are released inappropriately and damage the lining of the air passages. It is one of the objectives of asthma treatment to stop eosinophils from accumulating in your lungs and to stop those already there from causing damage. Steroid inhalers have a key role in doing this.  In normal blood, eosinophils amount to about 0 to 3 percent of the white blood cells, but this is not such a good guide because variation in the number of other cells alters this figure. A figure of 0 percent normally just means that there were no eosinophils among the limited number of white blood cells examined by the technician, and this is quite normal. If the counting is done by machine, eosinophils are normally not counted at all, perhaps giving the false impression that there are none. It is better to express the number of eosinophils in blood as the number in a unit of volume. The normal range is about 0.04 to 0.4 eosinophils x 10^9 per litre in the UK, or 40,000,000 to 400,000,000 per litre, or 40 to 400 per cubic millimetre (microlitre). Source: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~aair/eosinophils.htm Misguided immune cells are to blame As long ago as the early 1900s, scientists knew eosinophils (e-o-SIN-o-fils), a type of immune cell made in bone marrow, played a major role in asthma. Early researchers found inflamed airway tissue, densely infiltrated by these white blood cells, in people with asthma. In 1979, Mayo Clinic researchers identified a protein within eosinophils, called major basic protein, that can damage tissue lining the airways. Now researchers have uncovered an entire network of cells and substances involved in the process. The role of each is still under study. Once immune cells are activated, the process becomes cyclic, with substances activating and reactivating each other, even after the original trigger is removed. Over time, if triggering events keep recurring, results of inflammation promote more severe asthma and recurrent attacks. Source:  http://www.mayohealth.org/mayo/9602/htm/asthma2.htm The Allergic Response. In people who have asthma caused by an allergic response, various airborne allergens or other triggers set off a cascade of events in the immune system that lead to inflammation and hyperreactivity in the airways. The process is not completely understood, but the conductor in this orchestra of immune factors appears to be subgroups of white blood cells known as helper T-cells. These subgroups, TH2-cells, and specifically those known as gamma delta T cells, overproduce interleukins (IL), a subgroup of immune factors known as cytokines, which are powerful inflammatory agents. Of special interest are IL 9, IL 5, and IL 13. Interleukin 5, for example, appears to attract eosinophil cells, which are important players in airway hyperreactivity. Interleukin 9 stimulates the release of antibodies known as immunoglobulin E (IgE). During an allergic attack, these antibodies can bind to various cells in the immune system, including eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells, which are generally concentrated in the lungs, skin, and mucous membranes. Once IgE binds to mast cells, these cells are programmed to release a number of chemicals, particularly those known as leukotrienes, that cause inflammatory changes in the airways of the lungs, including narrowing of the airways, mucus production, and stimulation of nerve endings in the airway lining. Source: http://www.discoveryhealth.com/DH/ihtIH/WSDSC000/20812/21983/258429.html THE ACTUAL CAUSE OF ASTHMA IS STILL NOT KNOWN! By 1995, the definition of asthma changed to that of a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways involving mast cells, eosinophils and T-lymphocytes (cells that migrate from the blood stream into the tissues of the lungs mediating an inflammatory reaction in the lungs). This inflammation is associated with airway hyper-responsiveness, airflow limitation (at least partially reversible) producing the respiratory symptoms of wheezing, breathlessness, cough and chest tightness. Source:  http://www.physicianmd.net/pulmonary_medicine.htm CURRENT RESEARCH: Dr Andrew Wardlaw = Leicester University Role of Protease Activated Receptors (PARs) in Eosinophil Activation Eosinophils are thought to be important in causing asthma. To cause asthma eosinophils need first to get into the lungs and secondly to release their inflammatory chemicals into the tissue. This requires the eosinophils to be switched from a resting to an activated (turned on) state. I believe that a new family of membrane proteins called protease activated receptors (PARs) are responsible for this process. The work outlined in this proposal is to see which members of the PAR family are … read more »

Response:

I don’t know.  It sounds like he’s being sarcastic, and that a cat wouldn’t have a choice.  IMO. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying.

Oh okay and the cat understands this right?  You really are a moron.  Time for the killfile.  I suggest everyone else do the same.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I reserve the right to kill myself the way I choose. I also acknowledge the safety of others, including my babies There does not have to be a confict in that. I have my room. Those that choose to visit me in my room know that there will be traces of cigarette smoke. I choose not to smoke a cigarette when I have visitors, but I cannot control the idiot cat! Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying. x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

*Eosinophils only kill parasites.  They’re not related to passive smoking, or *a result of passive smoking. *They can most commonly be a result of an allergy, such as hayfever. [plus, *they can cause asthma.] What, you’ve never heard of tobacco allergy? Stop pretending to know everything! Sheesh. I just posted a different article referring to the positive tobacco skin test I saw on a dog last week, too. -h. *

* Just saw a case 2 weeks back. 9m chihuahua with owners who were heavy * smokers. Dog was presented for coughing and inappetance. Bld tests showed * increased eosinophils. Conclude for yourself. * * * * —              "uber vaccae in quattuor partes divisum est."                  upenn school of vet med class of 2000

Response:

I don’t know.  It sounds like he’s being sarcastic, and that a cat wouldn’t have a choice.  IMO. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying.

Oh okay and the cat understands this right?  You really are a moron.  Time for the killfile.  I suggest everyone else do the same.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I reserve the right to kill myself the way I choose. I also acknowledge the safety of others, including my babies There does not have to be a confict in that. I have my room. Those that choose to visit me in my room know that there will be traces of cigarette smoke. I choose not to smoke a cigarette when I have visitors, but I cannot control the idiot cat! Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying. x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Oh come on! Facts please, so the idiot lurkers dont start another war 97% of all animates die of cancer. FACT.

Would you like to quote your source for this factoid (which is patently false)? Kyla, DVM

Response:

eosinophil: A white cell of the category known as granulocytes. These cells contain numerous dense granules in their cytoplasm that comprise a battery of highly active digestive chemicals and toxins. Their chief role is thought to be in combatting large parasites, although occasionally their activity may be triggered by other agents, potentially leading to damage of normal tissues (see eosinophilia myalgia syndrome). Source:  http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/cfs/glossary.htm New Light Shed On The Enigmatic Eosinophil Granulocyte; A Versatile Cell Of The Immune System. Arne Egesten and Johan Malm* – Abstract Eosinophils normally constitute only a few per cent of circulating leukocytes, though they are more numerous in tissues vulnerable to attack by environmental microorganisms. Eosinophils can kill invasive parasites, but they also have immunoregulatory functions and may be involved in, for example, the connective tissue remodeling that occurs in conjunction with inflammation. Although their effects may be beneficial to the host, for instance in the event of helminthic infestation, they may also cause tissue damage, for example in allergy and asthma. Recent years have witnessed significant advances in our knowledge of these fascinating but still enigmatic cells. Source: http://www.broombio.demon.co.uk/jifcc/Articles/eosinophil/new_light_s… the_enigmatic_.htm iet controls cat’s food allergies – DR. ROBERT SCOTT D.V.M. – - Special To The News Herald Dear Dr. Scott, A few months ago my cat Callie began vomiting after every meal. My veterinarian said Callie had a high eosinophil count and switched her to a special diet of chicken, dried duck, and potatoes. Since I have started her on the new diet, the vomiting has stopped. Can you tell me what eosinophils are, and why they caused her to vomit after eating? Melissa Dear Melissa, An eosinophil is a type of white blood cell that usually comprises from 2 to 12 percent of a cat’s total white blood cells. However, this percentage may rise dramatically if the cat is infected with parasites or if the animal is having an allergic response to something. This is due to the fact that eosinophils mobilize to help kill parasites as well as to help rid the body of the irritating substance causing the allergic reaction. Because Callie had a high eosinophil count, your veterinarian no doubt suspected an allergy or a parasite. You did not mention if Callie was tested for parasites or not, but because she has improved on her new diet, her problem was most likely a food allergy. Food allergies are relatively rare in cats, but when they do occur, they can cause many unpleasant problems such as vomiting, diarrhea, itching, and skin lesions. Source:  http://www.newsherald.com/archive/lifestyle/vs121497.htm Table 1. Likely and less likely causes of eosinophilia on the basis of severity (absolute eosinophil count) Likely causes                             Less likely causes —-  Mild (0.7-1.5 X 109/L) Allergic rhinitis                        Neoplasm Hay fever or atopy                    Gastrointestinal disease Extrinsic asthma                        Skin disease Drug reaction                            Certain infectious diseases Parasitic disease                        Long-term dialysis Occupational lung disease        Radiation therapy                                                  Immunodeficiency state Source: http://www.postgradmed.com/issues/1999/03_99/brigden.htm The immune response to infection IL5 also secreted by Th2 cells recruits eosinophils which can kill parasites by exocytosing a cytotoxic protein, cationic basic protein. Source:  http://rheumb.bham.ac.uk/teaching/clinimmunol/ci_chap1.htm ALLERGY & ASTHMA JOURNAL WATCH – JANUARY 2000 The color of sputum samples from asthmatics was found to correlate with quantity of inflammatory cells and bacteria. The more the sputum appeared yellow or green, the greater were the number of neutrophils (cells associated with infection) and amount of cultured bacteria (also suggesting infection). The quantity of eosinophils (cells associated with allergies) did not vary with sputum color. There was no difference between asthmatic smokers and nonsmokers. JACI 1/00, p.182 Source:  http://www.allergyjournals.com/jan00.html Eosinophils – mischief-makers in asthma  Whatever are eosinophils? Eosinophils are a type of white blood cell (corpuscle) and take up the red dye eosin when blood is examined under a microscope by the commonest method. They accumulate wherever allergic reactions like those in asthma take place. Their natural role is to defend us against parasites. In fact allergies such as asthma are probably a malfunction of our protective mechanism against parasites.  Diagram of eosinophil as seen under the microscope after staining a blood smear with the red dye eosin, which stains the granules in the cytoplasm and with haematoxylin, which stains the nucleus blue. In the body all these things are colourless, of course. The nucleus consists of two lobes. The red-stained granules contain toxic proteins, ready for secretion from the cell. The toxins from the granules are important for killing parasites, but in asthma they are released inappropriately and damage the lining of the air passages. It is one of the objectives of asthma treatment to stop eosinophils from accumulating in your lungs and to stop those already there from causing damage. Steroid inhalers have a key role in doing this.  In normal blood, eosinophils amount to about 0 to 3 percent of the white blood cells, but this is not such a good guide because variation in the number of other cells alters this figure. A figure of 0 percent normally just means that there were no eosinophils among the limited number of white blood cells examined by the technician, and this is quite normal. If the counting is done by machine, eosinophils are normally not counted at all, perhaps giving the false impression that there are none. It is better to express the number of eosinophils in blood as the number in a unit of volume. The normal range is about 0.04 to 0.4 eosinophils x 10^9 per litre in the UK, or 40,000,000 to 400,000,000 per litre, or 40 to 400 per cubic millimetre (microlitre). Source: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~aair/eosinophils.htm Misguided immune cells are to blame As long ago as the early 1900s, scientists knew eosinophils (e-o-SIN-o-fils), a type of immune cell made in bone marrow, played a major role in asthma. Early researchers found inflamed airway tissue, densely infiltrated by these white blood cells, in people with asthma. In 1979, Mayo Clinic researchers identified a protein within eosinophils, called major basic protein, that can damage tissue lining the airways. Now researchers have uncovered an entire network of cells and substances involved in the process. The role of each is still under study. Once immune cells are activated, the process becomes cyclic, with substances activating and reactivating each other, even after the original trigger is removed. Over time, if triggering events keep recurring, results of inflammation promote more severe asthma and recurrent attacks. Source:  http://www.mayohealth.org/mayo/9602/htm/asthma2.htm The Allergic Response. In people who have asthma caused by an allergic response, various airborne allergens or other triggers set off a cascade of events in the immune system that lead to inflammation and hyperreactivity in the airways. The process is not completely understood, but the conductor in this orchestra of immune factors appears to be subgroups of white blood cells known as helper T-cells. These subgroups, TH2-cells, and specifically those known as gamma delta T cells, overproduce interleukins (IL), a subgroup of immune factors known as cytokines, which are powerful inflammatory agents. Of special interest are IL 9, IL 5, and IL 13. Interleukin 5, for example, appears to attract eosinophil cells, which are important players in airway hyperreactivity. Interleukin 9 stimulates the release of antibodies known as immunoglobulin E (IgE). During an allergic attack, these antibodies can bind to various cells in the immune system, including eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells, which are generally concentrated in the lungs, skin, and mucous membranes. Once IgE binds to mast cells, these cells are programmed to release a number of chemicals, particularly those known as leukotrienes, that cause inflammatory changes in the airways of the lungs, including narrowing of the airways, mucus production, and stimulation of nerve endings in the airway lining. Source: http://www.discoveryhealth.com/DH/ihtIH/WSDSC000/20812/21983/258429.html THE ACTUAL CAUSE OF ASTHMA IS STILL NOT KNOWN! By 1995, the definition of asthma changed to that of a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways involving mast cells, eosinophils and T-lymphocytes (cells that migrate from the blood stream into the tissues of the lungs mediating an inflammatory reaction in the lungs). This inflammation is associated with airway hyper-responsiveness, airflow limitation (at least partially reversible) producing the respiratory symptoms of wheezing, breathlessness, cough and chest tightness. Source:  http://www.physicianmd.net/pulmonary_medicine.htm CURRENT RESEARCH: Dr Andrew Wardlaw = Leicester University Role of Protease Activated Receptors (PARs) in Eosinophil Activation Eosinophils are thought to be important in causing asthma. To cause asthma eosinophils need first to get into the lungs and secondly to release their inflammatory chemicals into the tissue. This requires the eosinophils to be switched from a resting to an activated (turned on) state. I believe that a new family of membrane proteins called protease activated receptors (PARs) are responsible for this process. The work outlined in this proposal is to see which members of the PAR family are … read more »

Response:

Okay and where did this "fact" come from?  It is NOT true.  Renal failure makes up a big percentage of animal deaths.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Oh come on! Facts please, so the idiot lurkers dont start another war 97% of all animates die of cancer. FACT. Stop putting your butts up their butts did you? Thats about the only difference you quitting doing that would have. I know the cancer rate in my cats went down after I quit 6 years ago. Twyla Jane

Response:

Oh okay and the cat understands this right?  You really are a moron.  Time for the killfile.  I suggest everyone else do the same.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I reserve the right to kill myself the way I choose. I also acknowledge the safety of others, including my babies There does not have to be a confict in that. I have my room. Those that choose to visit me in my room know that there will be traces of cigarette smoke. I choose not to smoke a cigarette when I have visitors, but I cannot control the idiot cat! Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying. x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Eosinophils only kill parasites.  They’re not related to passive smoking, or a result of passive smoking. They can most commonly be a result of an allergy, such as hayfever. [plus, they can cause asthma.] Stop pretending to be a scientist. Vanessa

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just saw a case 2 weeks back. 9m chihuahua with owners who were heavy smokers. Dog was presented for coughing and inappetance. Bld tests showed increased eosinophils. Conclude for yourself.

Response:

Eosinophils only kill parasites.  They’re not related to passive smoking, or a result of passive smoking. They can most commonly be a result of an allergy, such as hayfever. [plus, they can cause asthma.] Stop pretending to be a scientist. Vanessa

Ok Sherlock, first you say they *only* kill parasites, then you say they result from allergies.   But how can they result from allergies to then function as parasite killers?  Makes no sense to me, BTW I am a scientist. Eosinophils counts are higher in parasite infested animals, and in allergic reactions.  They cannot cause asthma. You need to read up before slamming a medical opinion.  Take a course in logic and another in  technical writing. Kyla, DVM

Response:

Oh my GOD! Watering lawns causes cancer in dogs who smoke indoors! Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

I reserve the right to kill myself the way I choose. I also acknowledge the safety of others, including my babies There does not have to be a confict in that. I have my room. Those that choose to visit me in my room know that there will be traces of cigarette smoke. I choose not to smoke a cigarette when I have visitors, but I cannot control the idiot cat! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying. x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Second hand smoke affects animals as it does people. What we see most often is allergic reactions to the smoke. The RAST allergy test we use includes tobacco smoke and many animals appear to be sensitive. Some, presumably smokers, may make light of second hand smoke but it does cause clinical problems in some pets. We have many owners that although they have not given up smoking no longer smoke indoors.We applaud their concern. JEP – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Oh my GOD! Watering lawns causes cancer in dogs who smoke indoors! Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

– JEP  vet http://www.wbvc.bc.ca Before you buy.

Response:

It may be that animals only suffer the more minor reactions to smoke, as you mention, rather than actually developing cancer, since they are smart enough to leave the area which the human is smoking. While we humans stay nearby, inhaling more. Just another example of our pets being smarter than ourselves!  ;-) — "For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Second hand smoke affects animals as it does people. What we see most often is allergic reactions to the smoke. The RAST allergy test we use includes tobacco smoke and many animals appear to be sensitive. Some, presumably smokers, may make light of second hand smoke but it does cause clinical problems in some pets. We have many owners that although they have not given up smoking no longer smoke indoors.We applaud their concern. JEP Oh my GOD! Watering lawns causes cancer in dogs who smoke indoors! Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC. — JEP  vet http://www.wbvc.bc.ca Before you buy.

Response:

x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her?

I can’t imagine doggy lungs being any different to human lungs, which is why dogs often end up as lab animals :-( You could try giving the facts regarding second hand smoke, but IMHO, most smokers don’t tend to be too concerned about other people’s (or animals) health, even if the passive smokers are their very own family. Godd luck though, your message might get through. I hope it does. Yowie

Response:

Yep, here we go again, can’t say for certain. = bs!

Dave, are you an angry smoker?  There are lung cancer studies done on beagles. You can search them out, I don’t have time to do it for you. I have read them in the past, and they do prove that breathing cigarette smoke is just as dangerous for dogs as for humans.  The reason more dogs don’t show us the lung damage is simply related to the lifespan of dogs.  They usually die of something else before the lung damage does them in. Kyla, DVM

Response:

You could maybe do a search on second hand smoke on the web and the impact it has on people … it’s every bit as harmful. (Can’t give you specific examples pertaining to pets though … sorry) It’s very selfish of your friends to force their bad habit on innocent pets who have no choice in the matter. It’s been my experience though that some smokers put their habit before all else … in fact a friend of mine won’t go to lunch with me anymore cus I asked her not to smoke during the meal … she prefers to dine with smokes, which kinda hurts.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

I know the cancer rate in my cats went down after I quit 6 years ago. Twyla Jane – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

I can’t say for certain, but I would suspect that second hand smoke might be almost as bad for our pets as for children.  Children have small airways so more of the smoke is going to be able be caught in the mucus (and they breathe more often) than adults and childrens cells are more sensitive to carcinogens than adult cells because they are dividing more frequently. Dividing and growing means that there can be more damage relative to cells that are dividing only infrequently to produce replacements. They pets are not growing as quickly perhaps, but they do have smaller airways and they do breathe faster.  This I suspect should lead to more problems from second hand smoke for pets than an adult human but less than a human child.  Of course, kittens and pups will have as much perhaps more problems than a human infant.  They are smaller to start and grow much faster. Larry Osborne

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

Ask yourself, does it affect humans? Cats and Dogs lungs work in just the same way as ours.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

Response:

Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying.

x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

Oh come on! Facts please, so the idiot lurkers dont start another war 97% of all animates die of cancer. FACT. Stop putting your butts up their butts did you? Thats about the only difference you quitting doing that would have. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I know the cancer rate in my cats went down after I quit 6 years ago. Twyla Jane

Response:

Yes Tracy, nobody knows of any studies, but they are always prepared to come up with these FACTS – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I had a vet about six years ago tell me that secondhand smoke damages the lungs of pets.  I don’t know of any studies, but I am sure if you did an internet search you could find one. Tracy x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Yep, here we go again, can’t say for certain. = bs! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I can’t say for certain, but I would suspect that second hand smoke might be almost as bad for our pets as for children.  Children have small airways so more of the smoke is going to be able be caught in the mucus (and they breathe more often) than adults and childrens cells are more sensitive to carcinogens than adult cells because they are dividing more frequently. Dividing and growing means that there can be more damage relative to cells that are dividing only infrequently to produce replacements. They pets are not growing as quickly perhaps, but they do have smaller airways and they do breathe faster.  This I suspect should lead to more problems from second hand smoke for pets than an adult human but less than a human child.  Of course, kittens and pups will have as much perhaps more problems than a human infant.  They are smaller to start and grow much faster. Larry Osborne x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

I would simply assume that being an oxygen-breathing mammal with lungs, that they would be just as prone to damage by second hand smoke as any other animal, of which humans are, too.  Dogs are a little different in the way Cancers sometimes act in them, from what I understand, but I can’t imagine that constantly being around smoke would do no harm. GH

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

I smoked for 14 years, actually. I quit just about 2 months ago. I didn’t smoke in the same room with my animals and I think it’s ridiculous to say that a smoker shouldn’t say anything about the safety or well being of animals. Mine are very healthy and well cared for, which is far more than I can say for greater than 70% of the patients I see every shift. And most of their delightful owners are non-smoking jerks. Although I am very pleased not to be smoking any longer, I do not feel that a persons choice to smoke or not smoke has anything to do with the content of their character or their ability to be a good, loving, and responsible pet owner. And a little more on topic, last months BirdTalk ran an article about the effects of second hand smoke on birds. And I believe that there have been some studies published in the JAVMA also. For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical.

Practice random acts of intelligence and senseless acts of self control. * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet’s Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet – Free!

Response:

I had a vet about six years ago tell me that secondhand smoke damages the lungs of pets.  I don’t know of any studies, but I am sure if you did an internet search you could find one.   Tracy – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

I don’t know.  It sounds like he’s being sarcastic, and that a cat wouldn’t have a choice.  IMO. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying.

Oh okay and the cat understands this right?  You really are a moron.  Time for the killfile.  I suggest everyone else do the same.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I reserve the right to kill myself the way I choose. I also acknowledge the safety of others, including my babies There does not have to be a confict in that. I have my room. Those that choose to visit me in my room know that there will be traces of cigarette smoke. I choose not to smoke a cigarette when I have visitors, but I cannot control the idiot cat! Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying. x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Oh come on! Facts please, so the idiot lurkers dont start another war 97% of all animates die of cancer. FACT.

Would you like to quote your source for this factoid (which is patently false)? Kyla, DVM

Response:

eosinophil: A white cell of the category known as granulocytes. These cells contain numerous dense granules in their cytoplasm that comprise a battery of highly active digestive chemicals and toxins. Their chief role is thought to be in combatting large parasites, although occasionally their activity may be triggered by other agents, potentially leading to damage of normal tissues (see eosinophilia myalgia syndrome). Source:  http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/diseases/cfs/glossary.htm New Light Shed On The Enigmatic Eosinophil Granulocyte; A Versatile Cell Of The Immune System. Arne Egesten and Johan Malm* – Abstract Eosinophils normally constitute only a few per cent of circulating leukocytes, though they are more numerous in tissues vulnerable to attack by environmental microorganisms. Eosinophils can kill invasive parasites, but they also have immunoregulatory functions and may be involved in, for example, the connective tissue remodeling that occurs in conjunction with inflammation. Although their effects may be beneficial to the host, for instance in the event of helminthic infestation, they may also cause tissue damage, for example in allergy and asthma. Recent years have witnessed significant advances in our knowledge of these fascinating but still enigmatic cells. Source: http://www.broombio.demon.co.uk/jifcc/Articles/eosinophil/new_light_s… the_enigmatic_.htm iet controls cat’s food allergies – DR. ROBERT SCOTT D.V.M. – - Special To The News Herald Dear Dr. Scott, A few months ago my cat Callie began vomiting after every meal. My veterinarian said Callie had a high eosinophil count and switched her to a special diet of chicken, dried duck, and potatoes. Since I have started her on the new diet, the vomiting has stopped. Can you tell me what eosinophils are, and why they caused her to vomit after eating? Melissa Dear Melissa, An eosinophil is a type of white blood cell that usually comprises from 2 to 12 percent of a cat’s total white blood cells. However, this percentage may rise dramatically if the cat is infected with parasites or if the animal is having an allergic response to something. This is due to the fact that eosinophils mobilize to help kill parasites as well as to help rid the body of the irritating substance causing the allergic reaction. Because Callie had a high eosinophil count, your veterinarian no doubt suspected an allergy or a parasite. You did not mention if Callie was tested for parasites or not, but because she has improved on her new diet, her problem was most likely a food allergy. Food allergies are relatively rare in cats, but when they do occur, they can cause many unpleasant problems such as vomiting, diarrhea, itching, and skin lesions. Source:  http://www.newsherald.com/archive/lifestyle/vs121497.htm Table 1. Likely and less likely causes of eosinophilia on the basis of severity (absolute eosinophil count) Likely causes                             Less likely causes —-  Mild (0.7-1.5 X 109/L) Allergic rhinitis                        Neoplasm Hay fever or atopy                    Gastrointestinal disease Extrinsic asthma                        Skin disease Drug reaction                            Certain infectious diseases Parasitic disease                        Long-term dialysis Occupational lung disease        Radiation therapy                                                  Immunodeficiency state Source: http://www.postgradmed.com/issues/1999/03_99/brigden.htm The immune response to infection IL5 also secreted by Th2 cells recruits eosinophils which can kill parasites by exocytosing a cytotoxic protein, cationic basic protein. Source:  http://rheumb.bham.ac.uk/teaching/clinimmunol/ci_chap1.htm ALLERGY & ASTHMA JOURNAL WATCH – JANUARY 2000 The color of sputum samples from asthmatics was found to correlate with quantity of inflammatory cells and bacteria. The more the sputum appeared yellow or green, the greater were the number of neutrophils (cells associated with infection) and amount of cultured bacteria (also suggesting infection). The quantity of eosinophils (cells associated with allergies) did not vary with sputum color. There was no difference between asthmatic smokers and nonsmokers. JACI 1/00, p.182 Source:  http://www.allergyjournals.com/jan00.html Eosinophils – mischief-makers in asthma  Whatever are eosinophils? Eosinophils are a type of white blood cell (corpuscle) and take up the red dye eosin when blood is examined under a microscope by the commonest method. They accumulate wherever allergic reactions like those in asthma take place. Their natural role is to defend us against parasites. In fact allergies such as asthma are probably a malfunction of our protective mechanism against parasites.  Diagram of eosinophil as seen under the microscope after staining a blood smear with the red dye eosin, which stains the granules in the cytoplasm and with haematoxylin, which stains the nucleus blue. In the body all these things are colourless, of course. The nucleus consists of two lobes. The red-stained granules contain toxic proteins, ready for secretion from the cell. The toxins from the granules are important for killing parasites, but in asthma they are released inappropriately and damage the lining of the air passages. It is one of the objectives of asthma treatment to stop eosinophils from accumulating in your lungs and to stop those already there from causing damage. Steroid inhalers have a key role in doing this.  In normal blood, eosinophils amount to about 0 to 3 percent of the white blood cells, but this is not such a good guide because variation in the number of other cells alters this figure. A figure of 0 percent normally just means that there were no eosinophils among the limited number of white blood cells examined by the technician, and this is quite normal. If the counting is done by machine, eosinophils are normally not counted at all, perhaps giving the false impression that there are none. It is better to express the number of eosinophils in blood as the number in a unit of volume. The normal range is about 0.04 to 0.4 eosinophils x 10^9 per litre in the UK, or 40,000,000 to 400,000,000 per litre, or 40 to 400 per cubic millimetre (microlitre). Source: http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~aair/eosinophils.htm Misguided immune cells are to blame As long ago as the early 1900s, scientists knew eosinophils (e-o-SIN-o-fils), a type of immune cell made in bone marrow, played a major role in asthma. Early researchers found inflamed airway tissue, densely infiltrated by these white blood cells, in people with asthma. In 1979, Mayo Clinic researchers identified a protein within eosinophils, called major basic protein, that can damage tissue lining the airways. Now researchers have uncovered an entire network of cells and substances involved in the process. The role of each is still under study. Once immune cells are activated, the process becomes cyclic, with substances activating and reactivating each other, even after the original trigger is removed. Over time, if triggering events keep recurring, results of inflammation promote more severe asthma and recurrent attacks. Source:  http://www.mayohealth.org/mayo/9602/htm/asthma2.htm The Allergic Response. In people who have asthma caused by an allergic response, various airborne allergens or other triggers set off a cascade of events in the immune system that lead to inflammation and hyperreactivity in the airways. The process is not completely understood, but the conductor in this orchestra of immune factors appears to be subgroups of white blood cells known as helper T-cells. These subgroups, TH2-cells, and specifically those known as gamma delta T cells, overproduce interleukins (IL), a subgroup of immune factors known as cytokines, which are powerful inflammatory agents. Of special interest are IL 9, IL 5, and IL 13. Interleukin 5, for example, appears to attract eosinophil cells, which are important players in airway hyperreactivity. Interleukin 9 stimulates the release of antibodies known as immunoglobulin E (IgE). During an allergic attack, these antibodies can bind to various cells in the immune system, including eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells, which are generally concentrated in the lungs, skin, and mucous membranes. Once IgE binds to mast cells, these cells are programmed to release a number of chemicals, particularly those known as leukotrienes, that cause inflammatory changes in the airways of the lungs, including narrowing of the airways, mucus production, and stimulation of nerve endings in the airway lining. Source: http://www.discoveryhealth.com/DH/ihtIH/WSDSC000/20812/21983/258429.html THE ACTUAL CAUSE OF ASTHMA IS STILL NOT KNOWN! By 1995, the definition of asthma changed to that of a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways involving mast cells, eosinophils and T-lymphocytes (cells that migrate from the blood stream into the tissues of the lungs mediating an inflammatory reaction in the lungs). This inflammation is associated with airway hyper-responsiveness, airflow limitation (at least partially reversible) producing the respiratory symptoms of wheezing, breathlessness, cough and chest tightness. Source:  http://www.physicianmd.net/pulmonary_medicine.htm CURRENT RESEARCH: Dr Andrew Wardlaw = Leicester University Role of Protease Activated Receptors (PARs) in Eosinophil Activation Eosinophils are thought to be important in causing asthma. To cause asthma eosinophils need first to get into the lungs and secondly to release their inflammatory chemicals into the tissue. This requires the eosinophils to be switched from a resting to an activated (turned on) state. I believe that a new family of membrane proteins called protease activated receptors (PARs) are responsible for this process. The work outlined in this proposal is to see which members of the PAR family are … read more »

Response:

Okay and where did this "fact" come from?  It is NOT true.  Renal failure makes up a big percentage of animal deaths.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Oh come on! Facts please, so the idiot lurkers dont start another war 97% of all animates die of cancer. FACT. Stop putting your butts up their butts did you? Thats about the only difference you quitting doing that would have. I know the cancer rate in my cats went down after I quit 6 years ago. Twyla Jane

Response:

Oh okay and the cat understands this right?  You really are a moron.  Time for the killfile.  I suggest everyone else do the same.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I reserve the right to kill myself the way I choose. I also acknowledge the safety of others, including my babies There does not have to be a confict in that. I have my room. Those that choose to visit me in my room know that there will be traces of cigarette smoke. I choose not to smoke a cigarette when I have visitors, but I cannot control the idiot cat! Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying. x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Eosinophils only kill parasites.  They’re not related to passive smoking, or a result of passive smoking. They can most commonly be a result of an allergy, such as hayfever. [plus, they can cause asthma.] Stop pretending to be a scientist. Vanessa

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Just saw a case 2 weeks back. 9m chihuahua with owners who were heavy smokers. Dog was presented for coughing and inappetance. Bld tests showed increased eosinophils. Conclude for yourself.

Response:

Eosinophils only kill parasites.  They’re not related to passive smoking, or a result of passive smoking. They can most commonly be a result of an allergy, such as hayfever. [plus, they can cause asthma.] Stop pretending to be a scientist. Vanessa

Ok Sherlock, first you say they *only* kill parasites, then you say they result from allergies.   But how can they result from allergies to then function as parasite killers?  Makes no sense to me, BTW I am a scientist. Eosinophils counts are higher in parasite infested animals, and in allergic reactions.  They cannot cause asthma. You need to read up before slamming a medical opinion.  Take a course in logic and another in  technical writing. Kyla, DVM

Response:

Oh my GOD! Watering lawns causes cancer in dogs who smoke indoors! Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

I reserve the right to kill myself the way I choose. I also acknowledge the safety of others, including my babies There does not have to be a confict in that. I have my room. Those that choose to visit me in my room know that there will be traces of cigarette smoke. I choose not to smoke a cigarette when I have visitors, but I cannot control the idiot cat! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying. x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Second hand smoke affects animals as it does people. What we see most often is allergic reactions to the smoke. The RAST allergy test we use includes tobacco smoke and many animals appear to be sensitive. Some, presumably smokers, may make light of second hand smoke but it does cause clinical problems in some pets. We have many owners that although they have not given up smoking no longer smoke indoors.We applaud their concern. JEP – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Oh my GOD! Watering lawns causes cancer in dogs who smoke indoors! Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

– JEP  vet http://www.wbvc.bc.ca Before you buy.

Response:

It may be that animals only suffer the more minor reactions to smoke, as you mention, rather than actually developing cancer, since they are smart enough to leave the area which the human is smoking. While we humans stay nearby, inhaling more. Just another example of our pets being smarter than ourselves!  ;-) — "For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Second hand smoke affects animals as it does people. What we see most often is allergic reactions to the smoke. The RAST allergy test we use includes tobacco smoke and many animals appear to be sensitive. Some, presumably smokers, may make light of second hand smoke but it does cause clinical problems in some pets. We have many owners that although they have not given up smoking no longer smoke indoors.We applaud their concern. JEP Oh my GOD! Watering lawns causes cancer in dogs who smoke indoors! Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail) — Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC. — JEP  vet http://www.wbvc.bc.ca Before you buy.

Response:

x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her?

I can’t imagine doggy lungs being any different to human lungs, which is why dogs often end up as lab animals :-( You could try giving the facts regarding second hand smoke, but IMHO, most smokers don’t tend to be too concerned about other people’s (or animals) health, even if the passive smokers are their very own family. Godd luck though, your message might get through. I hope it does. Yowie

Response:

Yep, here we go again, can’t say for certain. = bs!

Dave, are you an angry smoker?  There are lung cancer studies done on beagles. You can search them out, I don’t have time to do it for you. I have read them in the past, and they do prove that breathing cigarette smoke is just as dangerous for dogs as for humans.  The reason more dogs don’t show us the lung damage is simply related to the lifespan of dogs.  They usually die of something else before the lung damage does them in. Kyla, DVM

Response:

You could maybe do a search on second hand smoke on the web and the impact it has on people … it’s every bit as harmful. (Can’t give you specific examples pertaining to pets though … sorry) It’s very selfish of your friends to force their bad habit on innocent pets who have no choice in the matter. It’s been my experience though that some smokers put their habit before all else … in fact a friend of mine won’t go to lunch with me anymore cus I asked her not to smoke during the meal … she prefers to dine with smokes, which kinda hurts.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

I know the cancer rate in my cats went down after I quit 6 years ago. Twyla Jane – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

I can’t say for certain, but I would suspect that second hand smoke might be almost as bad for our pets as for children.  Children have small airways so more of the smoke is going to be able be caught in the mucus (and they breathe more often) than adults and childrens cells are more sensitive to carcinogens than adult cells because they are dividing more frequently. Dividing and growing means that there can be more damage relative to cells that are dividing only infrequently to produce replacements. They pets are not growing as quickly perhaps, but they do have smaller airways and they do breathe faster.  This I suspect should lead to more problems from second hand smoke for pets than an adult human but less than a human child.  Of course, kittens and pups will have as much perhaps more problems than a human infant.  They are smaller to start and grow much faster. Larry Osborne

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

Ask yourself, does it affect humans? Cats and Dogs lungs work in just the same way as ours.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

Oddly, I was just out in the front yard talking to my next-door neighbor. She was watering her lawn and smoking. We were discussing other matters and she mentioned that she always smokes outside because her Golden Retriever used to get very sick when she smoked indoors. Now that she smokes only outside, the dog has never gotten sick again. Not exactly scientific evidence but there you have it. Candace (take the litter out before replying by e-mail)

Response:

Anyone who smokes in a home or place with another person or *body* is ignorant if they don’t think it’s hurting those around them.  For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical. Mini Me (Yeah, Baby!) Remove (one billion dollars) before replying.

x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

Oh come on! Facts please, so the idiot lurkers dont start another war 97% of all animates die of cancer. FACT. Stop putting your butts up their butts did you? Thats about the only difference you quitting doing that would have. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I know the cancer rate in my cats went down after I quit 6 years ago. Twyla Jane

Response:

Yes Tracy, nobody knows of any studies, but they are always prepared to come up with these FACTS – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I had a vet about six years ago tell me that secondhand smoke damages the lungs of pets.  I don’t know of any studies, but I am sure if you did an internet search you could find one. Tracy x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

Yep, here we go again, can’t say for certain. = bs! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I can’t say for certain, but I would suspect that second hand smoke might be almost as bad for our pets as for children.  Children have small airways so more of the smoke is going to be able be caught in the mucus (and they breathe more often) than adults and childrens cells are more sensitive to carcinogens than adult cells because they are dividing more frequently. Dividing and growing means that there can be more damage relative to cells that are dividing only infrequently to produce replacements. They pets are not growing as quickly perhaps, but they do have smaller airways and they do breathe faster.  This I suspect should lead to more problems from second hand smoke for pets than an adult human but less than a human child.  Of course, kittens and pups will have as much perhaps more problems than a human infant.  They are smaller to start and grow much faster. Larry Osborne x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

– Go to http://www.getpaid4.com?possums to make $$$ using your PC.

Response:

I would simply assume that being an oxygen-breathing mammal with lungs, that they would be just as prone to damage by second hand smoke as any other animal, of which humans are, too.  Dogs are a little different in the way Cancers sometimes act in them, from what I understand, but I can’t imagine that constantly being around smoke would do no harm. GH

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

I smoked for 14 years, actually. I quit just about 2 months ago. I didn’t smoke in the same room with my animals and I think it’s ridiculous to say that a smoker shouldn’t say anything about the safety or well being of animals. Mine are very healthy and well cared for, which is far more than I can say for greater than 70% of the patients I see every shift. And most of their delightful owners are non-smoking jerks. Although I am very pleased not to be smoking any longer, I do not feel that a persons choice to smoke or not smoke has anything to do with the content of their character or their ability to be a good, loving, and responsible pet owner. And a little more on topic, last months BirdTalk ran an article about the effects of second hand smoke on birds. And I believe that there have been some studies published in the JAVMA also. For everyone that preaches anything in any animal news group about the safety or well being of any pet should not be a smoker.  It’s so hypocritical.

Practice random acts of intelligence and senseless acts of self control. * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet’s Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet – Free!

Response:

I had a vet about six years ago tell me that secondhand smoke damages the lungs of pets.  I don’t know of any studies, but I am sure if you did an internet search you could find one.   Tracy – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – x-no-archive:yes I am aware of friends who have a dog and two cats, and both the husband and wife are smokers. I was asked if "2nd hand smoke" could be damaging to the pets’ health. I advised the person to tell the owners to smoke outside, because she told me the dog "coughs" alot now. Is there any direct evidence that cigarette smoking endangers a cat or dog? I believe it does, but I cannot state this as a fact. What should I tell her? (ken) See My Digital Photos: http://www.MillenniumAdventures.com

Response:

Can back treatment help asthma?

Question:

I went to a DO who does adjustments and while doing the adjustment he asked me if my asthma was bothering me, at the time I said no but I woke up in the middle of the night with one of my worst attacks. I asked him how he new and he said my muscles were real tight in the area of the chest. He asked me if I had my asthma meds on hand in case I had a attack. He did not claim he could stop the attack just help relax the muscles

the old knee bone connected to the thigh bone…or the muscular equivalent…my exercises have concentrated on stretching my right hamstring…and it has made a massive difference to my back eric "the alternative to seeing things in black and white is to see them in full colour"

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I have heard about an unlikely asthma treatment from a mother of an asthmatic son. I would like to hear opinions on this: This woman’s son suffers from extreme allergies and asthma.  He is in his late twenties.  He gets attacks from many chemical and natural substances (fragrances, smoke, pollen…).  He also has a bad back, possibly scoliosis or arthritis in the lower back.  He received treatment for his back problems by a chiropractor for months.  Somehow, his ashmatic reactions lessoned so dramatically that the only allergen that bothers him is cigarette smoke. I am in the same predicament as he is, with the severe allergies and asthma, terrible lower back pain and in my late twenties.  I might try this treatment but I would like to know FIRST if anyone has tried this for their asthma. teresap Before you buy.

sort out the back pain for its own sake…I have had a history of back problems, through a pair of slightly deformed vertebrae and a seriously inaccurate van driver (I was cycling, he forced me over a railing)…my asthma did seem worse when my back was at its worst, but all aspects of my health and mental state suffered I had a few sessions with a physiotherapist…this has the advantage that you learn exercises that you can continue to do yourself…in the long term it seems to be the best value, though a chiro or an osteopath may get quicker instant results eric "the alternative to seeing things in black and white is to see them in full colour"

Response:

I went to a DO who does adjustments and while doing the adjustment he asked me if my asthma was bothering me, at the time I said no but I woke up in the middle of the night with one of my worst attacks. I asked him how he new and he said my muscles were real tight in the area of the chest. He asked me if I had my asthma meds on hand in case I had a attack. He did not claim he could stop the attack just help relax the muscles – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I have heard about an unlikely asthma treatment from a mother of an asthmatic son. I would like to hear opinions on this: This woman’s son suffers from extreme allergies and asthma.  He is in his late twenties.  He gets attacks from many chemical and natural substances (fragrances, smoke, pollen…).  He also has a bad back, possibly scoliosis or arthritis in the lower back.  He received treatment for his back problems by a chiropractor for months.  Somehow, his ashmatic reactions lessoned so dramatically that the only allergen that bothers him is cigarette smoke. I am in the same predicament as he is, with the severe allergies and asthma, terrible lower back pain and in my late twenties.  I might try this treatment but I would like to know FIRST if anyone has tried this for their asthma. teresap Before you buy. sort out the back pain for its own sake…I have had a history of back problems, through a pair of slightly deformed vertebrae and a seriously inaccurate van driver (I was cycling, he forced me over a railing)…my asthma did seem worse when my back was at its worst, but all aspects of my health and mental state suffered I had a few sessions with a physiotherapist…this has the advantage that you learn exercises that you can continue to do yourself…in the long term it seems to be the best value, though a chiro or an osteopath may get quicker instant results eric "the alternative to seeing things in black and white is to see them in full colour"

Response:

I have heard about an unlikely asthma treatment from a mother of an asthmatic son. I would like to hear opinions on this: This woman’s son suffers from extreme allergies and asthma.  He is in his late twenties.  He gets attacks from many chemical and natural substances (fragrances, smoke, pollen…).  He also has a bad back, possibly scoliosis or arthritis in the lower back.  He received treatment for his back problems by a chiropractor for months.  Somehow, his ashmatic reactions lessoned so dramatically that the only allergen that bothers him is cigarette smoke. I am in the same predicament as he is, with the severe allergies and asthma, terrible lower back pain and in my late twenties.  I might try this treatment but I would like to know FIRST if anyone has tried this for their asthma. teresap Before you buy.

Response:

Health Hustlers!

Question:

I have noticed that there have been a number of postings on this group from companies trying to sell different kinds of herbal formulas and dietary supplements.  I have also noticed that some folks are reluctant to use western medical therapies to control and are looking for alternatives.  I just thought I would caution everyone to use your heads before adopting any of the alternative therapies being advertised.  Although this not true 100% of the time, your benefit from the herbal medicines and alternative therapies depends largely on how much of a sucker you are for the placebo effect.  In other words, they do not have any effect in and of themselves. The other thing I feel I should point out is that these remedies may or may not be safe.  I can certainly understand the desire to find an asthma treatment with as few side effects as possible so it’s probably tempting to go for an alternative therapy that claims to be free of side effects. Unfortunately, some of the herbal remedies and dietary supplements have side effects that are in some cases more dangerous than the ones associated with the mainstay asthma medicines.  This is especially true for those of us with allergies.  You could be allergic to something in the herbal remedy and that would defeat the purpose.  Remember, "natural" and "harmless" are not synonymous.  Finally, it’s important to realize that the people who sell this stuff are making a killing moneywise without providing a real viable treatment.  I hate to see anyone throw their mooney away like that. OK, I’ll come down from my soapbox now but I just want to caution y’all once again, think before you buy. Thanks for listening! Matt making a killing without provi

Response:

I agree you need to be careful with alternatives remedies. However you need to be careful of traditional meds too. How many people know 1 High doses of inhaled steroids (eg more than 800mcg per day of beclomethasone) considerably the increase risk of osteoporosis . 2 Current advice is that asthmatics should not be taking more than one ventolin (salbutamol)  puff a day because more than one dose  a day  makes asthma worse in the long run. These ’side effects’ aren’t widely publicised and they should be. That’s why many of us want to keep our med use as low as possible and if non drug methods such as breathing exercises help to do this we’ll use them. The ‘placebo effect’ (as you put it) of the breathing exercises I have been doing for the last 5 months has allowed me to reduce my Beclomethasone from 1000mcg a day to 100mcg a day and my ventolin from 4 or five a day to 0 a day. Best wishes Janet

Response:

Buteyko. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – what breathing exercises are you doing? I agree you need to be careful with alternatives remedies. However you need to be careful of traditional meds too. How many people know 1 High doses of inhaled steroids (eg more than 800mcg per day of beclomethasone) considerably the increase risk of osteoporosis . 2 Current advice is that asthmatics should not be taking more than one ventolin (salbutamol)  puff a day because more than one dose  a day makes asthma worse in the long run. These ’side effects’ aren’t widely publicised and they should be. That’s why many of us want to keep our med use as low as possible and if non drug methods such as breathing exercises help to do this we’ll use them. The ‘placebo effect’ (as you put it) of the breathing exercises I have been doing for the last 5 months has allowed me to reduce my Beclomethasone from 1000mcg a day to 100mcg a day and my ventolin from 4 or five a day to 0 a day. Best wishes Janet

Response:

what breathing exercises are you doing? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I agree you need to be careful with alternatives remedies. However you need to be careful of traditional meds too. How many people know 1 High doses of inhaled steroids (eg more than 800mcg per day of beclomethasone) considerably the increase risk of osteoporosis . 2 Current advice is that asthmatics should not be taking more than one ventolin (salbutamol)  puff a day because more than one dose  a day  makes asthma worse in the long run. These ’side effects’ aren’t widely publicised and they should be. That’s why many of us want to keep our med use as low as possible and if non drug methods such as breathing exercises help to do this we’ll use them. The ‘placebo effect’ (as you put it) of the breathing exercises I have been doing for the last 5 months has allowed me to reduce my Beclomethasone from 1000mcg a day to 100mcg a day and my ventolin from 4 or five a day to 0 a day. Best wishes Janet

Response:

A PRECIOUS RESOURCE

Question:

As an occasional observer of this newsgroup, it would seem that the readership would be well served by consulting authoritative sources that are indexed on the MEDLINE search of the National Library of Medicine.  To this end I offer the following URL, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PubMed/  Once entry is made type Buteyko or  ANYTHING  suggested by well-intentioned contributors to these proceedings.  In the case of Buteyko there exists one entry that appeared in an Australian medical journal.  I have not read the article and cannot comment on it’s content or the technique, of which I have no first-hand knowledge.  But YOU, reader, you can obtain this very same article that’s written with more authority than appears here in cyberspace.  Let’s replace the amateur detractors, with their quixotic prose, where they belong, nowhere, with authoritative, indexed writings from reputable journals by professionals who have the "hands on" experience.  Great use of our tax dollar! Allan Marshall, D.C. Manassas, VA Greetings, If I understand your way of thinking correctly, sir, then you as a medical practitioner are calling for more stringent  educated thinking and posting.  You wrote here on one occasion "I respect your qualifications to the extent that you’re an asthmatic sufferer".  But surely the converse statement "I respect your qualifications to the extent you are a medical expert (but without having personally suffered from asthma)" should also be used as a timely warning sometimes.  Isn

New Asthma sufferer

Question:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi,    I was recently diagnosed with adult on-set asthma following a bout with pneumonia (my first) earlier this year.   This note is a request for any encouragement you guys can provide.  I’m pretty bummed out about the whole thing.   I’m a 46 year-old female.  Except for the asthma, I have no health problems other than the occasional migraine.  However, I spent the last year and a half caring for my terminally ill mother (COPD); she passed away in June.  So my life has been pretty stressful of late.   My regular meds are albuterol (2 puffs every 3 hours as needed), serevent (3 puffs twice a day), and vanceril (4 puffs twice a day).  Currently, I’m on my 4th course of oral prednisone in 3 months.  Dosage is 60 mg, titrated down by 10 mg every 4th day.  I really hate the oral steroids–mess up my sleep, make me weepy and antsy, also blur out my vision to the extent that I can’t go to my job ( telecom analyst–which I love BTW).  My other loves are my husband, poodle, friends and neighbors, garden, and books.   While I’m not a natural athlete, I am an avid race-walker and completed a marathon in November 1997 (right before my mom came to live with me).  Right now, I have trouble walking up half a flight of stairs.   I am very depressed that I can’t seem to get this asthma stuff under control.  I do have faith in my doctor, who does regular pulmonary function tests as well as arterial blood gas tests.   Any advice or encouragment would be very appreciated by me.  I miss my walking and especially miss working in my garden–both activities seem to stimulate asthma attacks.   Oops, almost forgot to list my set of symptoms–great SOB, much pain in my chest and back, great pressure along my sternum, an intermittent non-productive cough, but no wheezing.   I’m not a wimp when it comes to pain.  I’ve lived with migraines my whole life and have learned to control them quite well.  Last year I lost no work time due to migraine–I’m proud of that.  Is it reasonable that I will learn to control this asthma stuff to the same degree?

Of course you will.  You don’t say what you have done to identify and eliminate triggers.  That is a very important part of controlling asthma.  So is controlling stress; of which you have had more than your share of late. Chris Owens

Response:

Hi everybody My first venture into the newsgroup, so please be kind to me! As a lifelong asthmatic, 68 this year,and all my life in the garage trade, I have noticed in the last ten years or so a marked worsening of my asthma, which I put down to unleaded fuel fumes, also ties in with the increase in asthma in young children in this country, (England). I find when working in the workshop the fumes from unleaded fuel affects me badly, whereas the fumes from leaded fuel make very little difference to my breathing. What do other people think?

Response:

WHEW!!! It sounds like someone is trying to "nuke" your athletic body. STRESS is murder and ALL of your stuff just might be related to other things going on in your life. If I were you, I would immediately seek counsel with other people before poisoning your body any more. Talk to Priests, Rabbi’s, whoever about some of the deeper emotions that might be rumbling around under the surface. Get a fantabulous massage. Spend a weekend in a health spa and pamper your body with lotsa good stuff. Do you have a lover? If so, isolate yourselves from the "world’s noise" and make passionate love, without inhibition, for hours, days whatever. If you don’t have a lover – get one. Do something that you have always been putting off. Try some acupuncture, seek the best. If you’re spiritual, pray – not necessarily for a cure, but just immerse yourself into a spiritual feast to calm and soothe. Good luck – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi,    I was recently diagnosed with adult on-set asthma following a bout with pneumonia (my first) earlier this year.   This note is a request for any encouragement you guys can provide.  I’m pretty bummed out about the whole thing.   I’m a 46 year-old female.  Except for the asthma, I have no health problems other than the occasional migraine.  However, I spent the last year and a half caring for my terminally ill mother (COPD); she passed away in June.  So my life has been pretty stressful of late.   My regular meds are albuterol (2 puffs every 3 hours as needed), serevent (3 puffs twice a day), and vanceril (4 puffs twice a day).  Currently, I’m on my 4th course of oral prednisone in 3 months.  Dosage is 60 mg, titrated down by 10 mg every 4th day.  I really hate the oral steroids–mess up my sleep, make me weepy and antsy, also blur out my vision to the extent that I can’t go to my job ( telecom analyst–which I love BTW).  My other loves are my husband, poodle, friends and neighbors, garden, and books.   While I’m not a natural athlete, I am an avid race-walker and completed a marathon in November 1997 (right before my mom came to live with me). Right now, I have trouble walking up half a flight of stairs.   I am very depressed that I can’t seem to get this asthma stuff under control.  I do have faith in my doctor, who does regular pulmonary function tests as well as arterial blood gas tests.   Any advice or encouragment would be very appreciated by me.  I miss my walking and especially miss working in my garden–both activities seem to stimulate asthma attacks.   Oops, almost forgot to list my set of symptoms–great SOB, much pain in my chest and back, great pressure along my sternum, an intermittent non-productive cough, but no wheezing.   I’m not a wimp when it comes to pain.  I’ve lived with migraines my whole life and have learned to control them quite well.  Last year I lost no work time due to migraine–I’m proud of that.  Is it reasonable that I will learn to control this asthma stuff to the same degree?   Sorry for blathering on so much–blame the prednisone :-) Thanks for listening.  While my friends are sympathetic, they just don’t understand my level of frustration with this disease.  Post any responses to the group or to my email.  Thanks again. Terry

Response:

Hi,     I was recently diagnosed with adult on-set asthma following a bout with pneumonia (my first) earlier this year.    This note is a request for any encouragement you guys can provide.  I’m pretty bummed out about the whole thing.    I’m a 46 year-old female.  Except for the asthma, I have no health problems other than the occasional migraine.  However, I spent the last year and a half caring for my terminally ill mother (COPD); she passed away in June.  So my life has been pretty stressful of late.    My regular meds are albuterol (2 puffs every 3 hours as needed), serevent (3 puffs twice a day), and vanceril (4 puffs twice a day).  Currently, I’m on my 4th course of oral prednisone in 3 months.  Dosage is 60 mg, titrated down by 10 mg every 4th day.  I really hate the oral steroids–mess up my sleep, make me weepy and antsy, also blur out my vision to the extent that I can’t go to my job ( telecom analyst–which I love BTW).  My other loves are my husband, poodle, friends and neighbors, garden, and books.    While I’m not a natural athlete, I am an avid race-walker and completed a marathon in November 1997 (right before my mom came to live with me).  Right now, I have trouble walking up half a flight of stairs.    I am very depressed that I can’t seem to get this asthma stuff under control.  I do have faith in my doctor, who does regular pulmonary function tests as well as arterial blood gas tests.    Any advice or encouragment would be very appreciated by me.  I miss my walking and especially miss working in my garden–both activities seem to stimulate asthma attacks.    Oops, almost forgot to list my set of symptoms–great SOB, much pain in my chest and back, great pressure along my sternum, an intermittent non-productive cough, but no wheezing.    I’m not a wimp when it comes to pain.  I’ve lived with migraines my whole life and have learned to control them quite well.  Last year I lost no work time due to migraine–I’m proud of that.  Is it reasonable that I will learn to control this asthma stuff to the same degree?    Sorry for blathering on so much–blame the prednisone :-) Thanks for listening.  While my friends are sympathetic, they just don’t understand my level of frustration with this disease.  Post any responses to the group or to my email.  Thanks again. Terry

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – Hi,     I was recently diagnosed with adult on-set asthma following a bout with pneumonia (my first) earlier this year.    This note is a request for any encouragement you guys can provide.  I’m pretty bummed out about the whole thing.    I’m a 46 year-old female.  Except for the asthma, I have no health problems other than the occasional migraine.  However, I spent the last year and a half caring for my terminally ill mother (COPD); she passed away in June.  So my life has been pretty stressful of late.    My regular meds are albuterol (2 puffs every 3 hours as needed), serevent (3 puffs twice a day), and vanceril (4 puffs twice a day).  Currently, I’m on my 4th course of oral prednisone in 3 months.  Dosage is 60 mg, titrated down by 10 mg every 4th day.  I really hate the oral steroids–mess up my sleep, make me weepy and antsy, also blur out my vision to the extent that I can’t go to my job ( telecom analyst–which I love BTW).  My other loves are my husband, poodle, friends and neighbors, garden, and books.    While I’m not a natural athlete, I am an avid race-walker and completed a marathon in November 1997 (right before my mom came to live with me).  Right now, I have trouble walking up half a flight of stairs.    I am very depressed that I can’t seem to get this asthma stuff under control.  I do have faith in my doctor, who does regular pulmonary function tests as well as arterial blood gas tests.    Any advice or encouragment would be very appreciated by me.  I miss my walking and especially miss working in my garden–both activities seem to stimulate asthma attacks.    Oops, almost forgot to list my set of symptoms–great SOB, much pain in my chest and back, great pressure along my sternum, an intermittent non-productive cough, but no wheezing.    I’m not a wimp when it comes to pain.  I’ve lived with migraines my whole life and have learned to control them quite well.  Last year I lost no work time due to migraine–I’m proud of that.  Is it reasonable that I will learn to control this asthma stuff to the same degree?    Sorry for blathering on so much–blame the prednisone :-) Thanks for listening.  While my friends are sympathetic, they just don’t understand my level of frustration with this disease.  Post any responses to the group or to my email.  Thanks again. Terry

Sorry to hear about your mother.  I lost mine 2 years ago.  I will keep you in my prayers. Now this asthma thing.  Have you seen a pulmonologist? Or is your GP treating your asthma?  It is very important that the physician treating you is very up to date on asthma treatment.  Routine arterial blood gases is not a common tool of diagnosis for the severity of asthma. There are many inhaled and oral drugs out there that can be tried to control your asthma.  Needing to use your rescue inhaler so much is an indication of your asthma not being in control.  I hesitate to give out medical advice, as I am just an asthmatic and not a doctor.  But, I do know using your rescue inhaler so much means your medications need to be adjusted. It is very easy to get down and discouraged, especially being on the prednisone.  I have been there.  With the right doctor, the right combination of medications, and a positive attitude things can improve. It may take some time, but, it can get better.  I will keep you in my prayers and if you would like to vent or just talk, feel free to e-mail me.  Best of luck and take care. — Lisa M. DeSavage Hinsbar Laboratories, Inc.

Response:

  I am very depressed that I can’t seem to get this asthma stuff under control.  I do have faith in my doctor, who does regular pulmonary function tests as well as arterial blood gas tests.

You might ask for a referral to an allergist.  Get tested for allergies and see if something in your environment is causing you problems.   Oops, almost forgot to list my set of symptoms–great SOB, much pain in my chest and back, great pressure along my sternum, an intermittent non-productive cough, but no wheezing.

if the pain in your muscles then the likely cause is that they are sore from the work of exhaling – which they are not designed for.   I’m not a wimp when it comes to pain.  I’ve lived with migraines my whole life and have learned to control them quite well.  Last year I lost no work time due to migraine–I’m proud of that.  Is it reasonable that I will learn to control this asthma stuff to the same degree?

Functioning in spite of pain is a matter of willpower and ‘toughness.’ But no amount of toughness will compensate for a lack of oxygen.   Sorry for blathering on so much–blame the prednisone :-)

Been there myself. "Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea — massive, diffucult to redirect, awe-inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." Gene Spafford 1992

Response:

I believe that asthma can definetely be triggered by hormones,. I myself have menstrual asthma and they are trying to figure out a plan. I finally have found a doctor that says there is a connection after many hospitalizations. Please keep asking your doctor or find one that cares. There is not alot of information out there about hormones and asthma yet but keep searching. Brenda

Response:

I believe that asthma can definetely be triggered by hormones,. I myself have menstrual asthma and they are trying to figure out a plan. I finally have found a doctor that says there is a connection after many hospitalizations. Please keep asking your doctor or find one that cares. There is not alot of information out there about hormones and asthma yet but keep searching.

You’ll find a very interesting French medical artical on this very subject at           www.pratique.fr/~pmourlan/femme.html. The chapter that could interest you is marked C4a: "Asthme et cycle menstruel". Hope this will help. Marthe Simard Charlesbourg, Canada

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – I believe that asthma can definetely be triggered by hormones,. I myself have menstrual asthma and they are trying to figure out a plan. I finally have found a doctor that says there is a connection after many hospitalizations. Please keep asking your doctor or find one that cares. There is not alot of information out there about hormones and asthma yet but keep searching. You’ll find a very interesting French medical artical on this very subject at          www.pratique.fr/~pmourlan/femme.html. The chapter that could interest you is marked C4a: "Asthme et cycle menstruel". Hope this will help. Marthe Simard Charlesbourg, Canada

Bonjour Marthe… L’adresse que vous donnez plus haut ne semble pas fonctionner. Yves Dussault

Response:

Get yourself to a board-certified asthma or allergy specialist and let him/her know right away when the meds aren’t working well enough. Communication is even more important in asthma than in most other ailments.

Response:

Some of the best things for asthma are the meds that help in preventing an attack.  Your doc needs to establish what type of asthma you have……there are different kinds.  Then a course of proper meds can be given.  These days there are many types of meds available that work well, but depending on whether you are an allergic asthmatic or exercised induced, stress induced, you need to find that out.  Different things work for different people.  Long term bronchodialators, inhaled steroids, accolate, cromolyn sodium…….your doc can best figure out what you need. I take Serevent, Intal, Vanceril, Proventil, along with allergy meds Claritin D, Vansanase AQ, and saline solution nasal irrigation.  I have allergies that trigger asthma.  Accolate is a new drug that some people are having success with, while others find that it is great in the beginning, then doesn’t work as well.  Do what is best for you, and your doc will tell you that.

Response:

I just recently was diagnosed with Asthma, and would appreciate any tips you can provide to try to ease the suffering of an Asthma attack.. 1.  Talk to your doctor about preventive medication, and do what you can to avoid them…but sometimes that’s like closing the barn door after the horse has set off your allergies, so…

<excellent advice snipped I would like to add one thing.  Buy a book on asthma and read it. Everyone in this newsgroup seems to have a favorite, but I suggest that you browse a few bookstores till you find one _you_ like. When you read the book make a list of questions to ask your doctor. The more you know, the better you can help your doctor get the asthma under control. ‘Reply to’ address changed to foil email spammers.

Response:

Thank you all for all your’e help.. your’e suggestionds are greatly appreciated….                                     Kait

Response:

I just recently was diagnosed with Asthma, and would appreciate any tips you can provide to try to ease the suffering of an Asthma attack.. I am on a bronchodialtor and inhaler right now , but hae really been suffering latley.. Any info you could give would be appreciated. thank you                  Kait

Relax & reduce tension. Read, watch tv, do whatever relaxes you. When my husband is having a bad time, he spends half the night sleeping upright in a recliner. Lying down makes his symptoms much worse. (On the other hand, I think the recliner is dust-mite heaven.) When my son is having problems, I give him albuterol via nebulisor every 3-4 hours. I’ve had doctors tell me it doesn’t matter whether albuterol is delivered via inhaler or nebulisor — but in my experience the nebulisor works significantly better when you’re having trouble and your breathing is fast and shallow. If you’re using an inhaler, try to hold the medicine in for as long as you can. When I take my son for a checkup, I omit the prior dose of albuterol. Too many times I’ve had the doctor say, "He doesn’t sound too bad. What’s the problem?" I’ve found that the doctor gets a better feel for my son’s condition when he can listen to his lungs BEFORE a needed dose of albuterol. Of course, I can only do this when it’s not too out of control — and I always have a dose ready to give him after the exam. I haven’t had asthma symptoms in years, but I haven’t forgotten how painful my chest felt. I used to take showers to wash pollen out of my hair. However, I almost passed out a couple of times when the steam from a hot shower made it almost impossible to breathe. Then I would lie around the house like a wet noodle. Don’t slack off on the preventive medications, even when you’re feeling better. (I have to nag my husband about that from time to time.) If you are suffering, go back to your doctor. He should be helping you find the right combination to breathe without effort. Mary

Response:

I just recently was diagnosed with Asthma, and would appreciate any tips you can provide to try to ease the suffering of an Asthma attack..

1.  Talk to your doctor about preventive medication, and do what you can to avoid them…but sometimes that’s like closing the barn door after the horse has set off your allergies, so… 2.  Get help *as soon as an attack starts*.  Ignoring an inconvenient attack can be very serious.  Have good directions by the phone.   3.  Take it easy. I’ve noticed that when a "minor" attack starts, exercise/effort makes it worse.  If you have a restful hobby or activity you enjoy (I’m lucky in that I enjoy reading), go with that.  The exception is pets; if you’re allergic to cats, hugging a cat might not help.  Also, cable television is good; there’s usually something on that can give you the mental challenge of figuring out why they put it on the air if you want that, or mindless pictures for when you feel like you can’t handle anything difficult. 4.  Try to relax.  You’ve lived through every attack you’ve had, because you reacted properly (or you got lucky, but learned from the experience. Either way, you’ve lived to fight another day.  This is that day.) Sometimes it doesn’t seem worth it, but it is.  For me, sometimes a shower helps, since steam is a (mild) bronchodiolator (for some people; others are very sensitive to heat), and if I’d been exposed to allergens this can help wash them away, and the "white noise" of the shower is very soothing. Of course, if you’re having trouble relaxing, don’t worry about the fact that you can’t relax too much…you’re having a problem, and stress is your body’s way of saying "fix the problem now please." 5.  Keep the communication open with your doctor and the people around you.  Once it really helped me when my wife knew to give me a Coke while we were waiting for medical help.  More importantly, she *knew* to call for help.  It’s difficult, but important, to communicate with the people around you about what’s wrong with you.  Also to remind them that asthma is serious, but not contagious. Good luck! Scott T.

Response:

I just recently was diagnosed with Asthma, and would appreciate any tips you can provide to try to ease the suffering of an Asthma attack.. I am on a bronchodialtor and inhaler right now , but hae really been suffering latley.. Any info you could give would be appreciated. thank you                   Kait

Response:

Garlic and Asthma

Question:

There’s definately something in garlic that helps some people…

…but acts as a trigger in others. Strange how something that can help one person can harm another. I wonder if we’re talking about the same disease? … roast full heads of garlic drizzled in olive oil and I love it.  

There’s also garlic kimchi (Korean pickles)–whole cloves of raw garlic left to mellow in a chili paste. Yum. Seems to scare off the cold germs too….                     Louise Bremner, from grimy Tokyo

Response:

I have an asthmatic reaction to something commonly found in fragrances. Even very brief exposure is enough to send me into a severe almost instant asthma attack. (Please no responses on possible psychological causes, it’s not psychological.)  Along with the asthma I get joint/muscle aches, fatigue, puffiness of hands and face, and difficulty in thinking clearly.  The asthma subsides quickly with getting away from the source and the use of RotoCaps Inhaler, the other symptoms lasts for hours. Several months ago I noticed a decrease im my asthmatic reaction after eating some food with fresh cooked garlic in it.  Since then I have been eating garlic 3-4 time a week.  My asthmatic reaction has greatly decreased.  I still cannot tolerate closed places with a heavy concentration (such as department stores) and long exposures.  But I can go to the grocery store without having an attack as long as I avoid the detergent aisle.  The garlic has no effect on the other symptoms. Does anyone have any ideas on why this is helping?  I tried garlic tablets, but they did not seem to help at all.  It seems that the ingredient that gives the garlic it’s odor is the part that helps.  I have done a little reading since on "natural and herbal remedies" and garlic has been used for asthma treatment.  I know garlic has been recently studied for effects on cholesterol and blood pressure, but I have seen none on uses for asthma. Thanks Betty Bridges

Response:

Several months ago I noticed a decrease im my asthmatic reaction after eating some food with fresh cooked garlic in it. Thanks Betty Bridges

There’s definately something in garlic that helps some people.  I noticed a post (I think here) about how to roast full heads of garlic drizzled in olive oil and I love it.  It may be psychological but I seem to feel better after eating that and my breathing even seems better. Let’s see if I can remember the recipe …. cut the top off a head of garlic and drizzle in olive oil, wrap in aluminum foil and bake at 350 degrees (can’t remember how long .. asthmatic memory).  Experiment Jim

Response:

Herbalife Health Care Products for Asthma sufferers

Question:

Your well-meaning Mom could kill some one.  Tell her to leave the practice of medicine to a licensed physician…and suggest she switch to Tupperware, or the Ding-Dong Lipstick Co., or the Amway Pyramid Scheme..or the pink Cadillac scam…but she’s playing with fire.

Response:

: My mother just became a Herbalife HCP agent.  The members have a meeting : every 2 weeks or so about new products, catalogs blah blah… She became : a member to go to these meetings to learn how to lose weight and she has : done so successfuly. At one of her meetings she asked around to see if : anyone knew about treatment for asthma sufferers.  A couple members : mentioned that there was a Herbalife Kit that she could get that had all : the herbs needed to build up the immune system, and suposedly it is : targeted for asthma treatment. Has anyone heard about using herbs : instead of chemicals to treat asthma? I will try to find out more about : this herb stuff and relay it to this roup. : Stephen Isn’t Herbalife that weight loss stuff that was found to be harmful back in the 80s?  I seem to remember it causing dehydration and other problems that led to gallbladder and kidney disfunction…? Marcy Tanter

Response:

The problem with asthmatics is that we have an over-active immune system. Our bodies regard all sorts of benign things from pollen to cat hairs to perfume as invaders and put us into crisis.  What we need is something that will suppress our immune systems not built them up.   Emily

Then maybe what the people meant is that it will calm down our immune system a little.  I don’t know, I wasn’t there and my mother is terrible at repeating what another person had said earlier (and be correct). But I will let you all know if something does happen for the good.  I am starting on this medication (herb stuff) this coming or next week. Stephen

Response:

   My mother just became a Herbalife HCP agent.  The members have a meeting    every 2 weeks or so about new products, catalogs blah blah… She became    a member to go to these meetings to learn how to lose weight and she has    done so successfuly. At one of her meetings she asked around to see if    anyone knew about treatment for asthma sufferers.  A couple members    mentioned that there was a Herbalife Kit that she could get that had all    the herbs needed to build up the immune system, and suposedly it is    targeted for asthma treatment. Has anyone heard about using herbs    instead of chemicals to treat asthma? I will try to find out more about    this herb stuff and relay it to this roup. Instead??? Just be d*mned sure that:         1) you’re not allergic to any of the herbs         2) you don’t do anything without Doctor’s permission         3) you don’t adjust your regular medications without Doctor’s            permission Has anyone died as the result of going herbal? Has any of these outfits been successfully sued for inducing some poor soul off of their regular asthma meds? This stuff just feeds the natural sense of denial that we all have about our condition. I just hope nobody gets hurt… — Mark Feblowitz,   GTE Laboratories Inc., 40 Sylvan Rd.  Waltham, MA 02254

Response:

My mother just became a Herbalife HCP agent.  The members have a meeting every 2 weeks or so about new products, catalogs blah blah… She became a member to go to these meetings to learn how to lose weight and she has done so successfuly. At one of her meetings she asked around to see if anyone knew about treatment for asthma sufferers.  A couple members mentioned that there was a Herbalife Kit that she could get that had all the herbs needed to build up the immune system, and suposedly it is targeted for asthma treatment. Has anyone heard about using herbs instead of chemicals to treat asthma? I will try to find out more about this herb stuff and relay it to this roup.

The problem with asthmatics is that we have an over-active immune system. Our bodies regard all sorts of benign things from pollen to cat hairs to perfume as invaders and put us into crisis.  What we need is something that will suppress our immune systems not built them up.   Emily Emily Rizzo – send private e-mail for information on Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), and a free brochure, sent in complete

Response: